|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
According to your source, specifically which branch of astrology did gann follow/advocate
?
nwinski wrote:
> Don Thompson wrote:
>
> > Norman,
> >
> > I recently heard the same thing from Bryce Gilmore, It was his
> > contention that Gann had the price time theory mapped out and making
> > money before he connected it to Astrology. Gilmore's testing is that
> > any CIT of major import is nailed by precise geometrical relationships,
> > usually 3 to 4 or so. He has found that Astrology leaves alot on the
> > table as far as promise when compared to the examination of time-price
> > geometry..
> >
> > Squaringly,
> >
> > Don,
>
> I wasn't aware that Bryce Gilmore knew enough Astrology to give it a fair trial?
>
> Cosmically,
>
> Norman
>
> >
> >
> > nwinski wrote:
> > >
> > > Adam Hefner wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am not a Gann expert, but it is my understanding that Gann developed his
> > > > geometry methods early in his career, and didn't use astrology until his
> > > > later years......so I question the "First and foremost".
> > > >
> > > > Adam Hefner,
> > >
> > > My source of information is someone who was Gann's partner for 10 years and
> > > his father worked with Gann before he did. Both son and father were Astrologers.
> > > What is your source of information?
> > > Anyone read "Tunnel Thru The Air"? It is a gold mine of hidden Astrological
> > > patterns. It tells what Astrological patterns Gann used to trade the markets.
> > > But, you have to know enough Astrology to be able to check out Gann's dates in
> > > an ephemeris. This book has been fully decoded by Bonnie Hill on video via a
> > > lecture she gave about 3 years ago.
> > >
> > > Cosmically,
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "nwinski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 6:03 PM
> > > > Subject: [RT] Re: Gen: Keep it quiet. {02}
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Brent wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have been reading one of Gann's books I'm astounded by just the few
> > > > things
> > > > > > that I've read in the first 50 pages. I have been writing indicators to
> > > > test
> > > > > > these things and I can't hardly believe my eyes. No one must actually
> > > > read
> > > > > > this stuff. I never hear anyone talk about it. I'm seriously thinking of
> > > > > > throwing all my old analysis away. I didn't think much about Gann until
> > > > I
> > > > > > figured out how to put Gann angles on charts. After that I could see
> > > > that
> > > > > > there might be something to it. I'm just dumbfounded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brent,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just wait until you add Astrology to your analysis. First and
> > > > foremost,
> > > > > Gann was an Astrology.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Wishes,
> > > > >
> > > > > Norman
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
|