|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Norman E. Phair" <ericrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hans:
>
> You said to John:
>
> > There is enough software outta
> > there who does some nice graph - if you provide those numbers I have a
> > look.
> >
>
> John no doubt spend a lot of time researching the
> information to give us the idea.
> Now you want him to spend more time to provide you
> the numbers and you will be
> so kind as to "have a look."
As he created the idea - he MUST have the numbers and as HE wanted
""Comments?..Suggestions?..Critique?..Help?..""
how could we give it MORE precise as with HIS numbers ??? whats the point
of each and everyone uses their own DIFFERENT numbers ?
> Isn't that nice of you.
> Why do you not get off your ____
> ____ and do some work on your own. Were you born with
> a silver spoon in your mouth?
> The next thing, you will ask him to place the order for
> you. Or maybe he will be willing
> to do the spread in his own account and send you the
> profit.
...bla bla bla bla - very efficient comment
> I and a lot of other people on
> here I am sure are grateful to John for his ideas.
GOOD and I wanted to send some Probabilty charts with HIS numbers so all
can learn and we can all discuss the SAME THING and not everyone uses his
own price assumptions
> Take the information and do the research yourself,
GIVE ME THE NUMBERS and I do it - I havent asked for anything else..
As GARY FUNKS very interesting post showed there is a big difference in
price each day and in volatility - so anyone taking his OWN number and
answer johns post will be just a big generalisation.
Why havent you answered to JOHNs mail if you know it all ? Only thing you do
is attack someone who is interested and want to discuss the issue after JOHN
posted the thing a second time as YOU didnt provide the answer in the first
place.
I arrived at this list just 1 week ago and didnt know that I have to send my mail
to you first for EDITING - THANKS
rgds hans
> if you like the results step up to the plate.
>
> Norman E.
> "Dr. John Cappello" wrote:
> >
> > I am going to try to stir interest in this one more time.I have been
> > studying this and hate failure.In my pursuit I have not come across this
> > method which concivably could work 9 of 10 times.In examination you will
> > see price is set 7% from upper and lower limits penetration that may
> > only happen 1 or 2 times per year.Assuming the worst [$1500 premium X 10
> > wins = $15,000 - protection cost - premium or $3500 -$1500 [2 X $2000]=
> > $11,000 profit per Strangle per year.My estimate is $7500 per Strangle
> > could make this lucrative.
> > > >
> > > > I think Strangles are doable if:
> > > >
> > > > 1.You can sell a 1510 call at a decent price.
> > > >
> > > > 2.Sell a 1320 put at a decent price.
> > > >
> > > > Protect the position by buying a 1510 call if S&P
> > > > hits 1485 and buying a 1320 put if S&P hits 1345.
> > > >
> > > > Comments?..Suggestions?..Critique?..Help?..
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > John
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
|