RE: SP500 Two questions....(Quakes and Rates)

["Stan Book" <sbook@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

WOW, Ben,

This is fantastic. 30- 80- & 90-year cycle tops timed to the day!

I've been led to believe that cycles expand and contract in time -- that the
actual length of 80- to 90- year cycle may vary a by a decade or more on
either side of the ideal (average) length. I've also been led to believe
that cycle tops are especially difficult to predict because of right and
left translation due to the influence of longer cycles.

You definitely have MY attention. I have been thinking that 4- 20- 30- &
60-year cycle terminations might converge "sometime" in late 1002 or early
2003. My guess has been that the super cycle top might converge with the
current 4-year cycle top, and that this cycle might see another leg up
lasting "well into" the year 2000. But, I nave no credentials.

I like the certainty of your projections. Can you tell us more about super
cycle theory?

Thanks,

Stan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Proffittak@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 1:17 PM
> To: HBernst963@xxxxxxx
> Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: SP500 Two questions....(Quakes and Rates)
>
>
> In a message dated 11/2/99 1:30:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, HBernst963
> writes:
>
> << Can you tell us on what you base that long term top prediction
> coming next
> week?
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Howard >>
> hello
> I use the supper cycle thory
> an 80 year cycle hi is due  11/3/99
> jim white hi on 11/9/99
> supper cycle hi on 30 year cycle on 11/10/99
> bradly top on 11/11/99
> and the supream cycle 90 years  on 11/19/99
> clyde lee top on  11/25/99 or 11/26/99
> regards
> Ben
>