[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Options instead of Underlying



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 10/11/99 1:13:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, heicz@xxxxxxxxx 
writes:

<< Buying options instead of the underlying asset(UA) makes some sense to me
 but I worry about volatility and time decay.  The idea of writing options
 doesn't agree with me either, and spreads sound as though they may be
 difficult to enter and if the strike price at the end of the trade is far
 different than the strikes that I entered the option spread at the market
 may be illiquid.  The idea of buying options still makes the most sense to
 me(I know; sell don't buy options) as my trading system is somewhat long
 term.  This is why I don't always want to enter a futures contract; the risk
 is usually too great.  So if I trade for the long term(a few weeks or maybe
 3 months) perhaps volatility and time decay don't matter as much as if I
 were trading for the short term; a few days?
 Another reason that I like the idea of buying options is that they can be
 excercised.  This is important if the market is illiquid.  Writing options
 has no such provision.
  >>
hi

on the next big down  day  , Buy   long term options  2001 etc
then while waiting for price to go up on the stocks  sell   the  higher 
strike price
example
aol 75 2001  calls  and sell  dec/99  120 calls
hope this heps
Ben