[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: In lieu of crash(trash) talk



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi Steve, why such anger? Different people different interests! In addition 
what you do displaying your sugar trades is no different from debating about 
the direction of rates, currencies, and asset valuations or is it?

I have traded sugar myself and even made money in it, but really I have no 
clues about it, why it should do this or that, I just looked at patterns I used 
in stocks and hence stay quiet on this. But I don't tell the others to stop 
talking about sugar. On the contrary, if you want to share your knowledge about 
what makes this market tick I am all ears... Maybe I can learn something there.

Gwenn


| -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
| Von:	Steve Karnish [SMTP:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
| Gesendet am:	Wednesday, October 06, 1999 5:23 PM
| An:	List; metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Betreff:	In lieu of crash(trash) talk
|
| List,
|
| From time to time, traders actually discuss "real" trades on this forum (the
| current sugar debate).  This is a really great "idea" that should be explored
| on a daily basis.  Think of it:  a place where "realtraders" can exchange
| "real trading"  ideas.  It's a concept that could catch on.
|
| For those who monitor real trades in the grain market:
|
| 9/29:  Went short: corn (214.75), oats (116.00), & wheat (286.50); (December
| contracts)
|
| 10/6:  Covered and went long oats (110.50)
|
| 10/7:  A close below 203 in Dec. corn and 262.25 in Dec. wheat triggers long
| positions tomorrow.
|
| This has little to do with the crash of '29, Alan Green"spun", or all those
| "politicos" conspiring to make my life miserable in the gold market.  But,
| guess what?  Real people are in these real trades, making real money, not
| letting the "news" influence their approach, and they are certainly not
| sitting around theorizing about the rise and fall of US economy.
|
| Steve Karnish
| Cedar Creek Trading
| http://www.stny.rr.com/abbracadabra/cybercast/
|  << Datei: ATT00007.html >> From ???@??? Thu Oct 07 06:49:29 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA06903
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 02:17:32 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id AAA24003
	for realtraders-sendemout; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 00:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id AAA23990
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 00:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr (esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr [158.156.156.29])
	by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id AAA15089
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 00:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (esmailfed2 [158.156.1.207])
	by esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02681;
	Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:38:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cmi.cdc.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA26922;
	Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:44:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Posted-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:44:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from eiche by cmi.cdc.fr (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA09564; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:42:15 +0200
Received: from ncc183 by eiche (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA25294; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:42:14 +0200
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:41:25 +0100
Message-ID: <01BF10A8.1F0CB5A0.ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Gwenael Gautier <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'fritz@xxxxxxxx'" <fritz@xxxxxxxx>,
        RealTraders Discussion Group
	 <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AW: How to protect assets
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:41:24 +0100
Organization: CDC Marches FKT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MimeMultipartBoundary"
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:   

Isn't it that it comes out differently every time anyway, meaning your best 
fundamental plans just go "boom" with the rest of it...?

Gwenn

| -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
| Von:	Gary Fritz [SMTP:fritz@xxxxxxxx]
| Gesendet am:	Wednesday, October 06, 1999 5:56 PM
| An:	RealTraders Discussion Group
| Betreff:	Re: How to protect assets
|
| Earl wrote:
| > I have studied this off and on in some detail over the past few
| > years and my most educated conclusion is that intermediate to long
| > term US treasuries should provide the greatest safety and highest
| > return.
|
| I didn't expect that answer AT ALL.  So you feel the rates are likely
| to go way down, thus increasing value of the bonds?  And you expect
| that increase to outweigh the losses to inflation or other attacks on
| the dollar's value?
|
| I don't know what to expect on this.  Rates up or down, inflation or
| deflation, I really don't have a good feel for which way it is likely
| to go when everything goes boom.  I wish I understood the mechanics
| better.  This is one time when this technical trader wishes he had a
| better fundamental background.
|
| "BruceB" <bruceb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > Just keep in mind that in both the 30's and in Japan it was
| > nominal rates that fell.  You might want to take into account what
| > real rates did during those periods in making your decision...
|
| I assume by this you mean that inflation sapped any gains?  Would you
| expand on your answer, please?
|
| I think this topic concerns all of us, and I'm very interested in
| pursuing the thread further.  Private emails from others indicate I'm
| not the only one.  I hope anyone else who feels they have a good
| handle on the likely scenarios and/or the best financial survival
| plans will share it with us.  Thanks!
| 
| Gary