|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=x-user-defined" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Fellow Traders:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This function works very well. I use the "Block
Sender" function daily because I made the mistake of placing a classified ad on
the Internet and the next day the junk e-mail came groves. So, Click
it, it works very well! Happy Trading! </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Terry S. Smith </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>MS</A> ; <A
href="mailto:boggio@xxxxxxxxx"; title=boggio@xxxxxxxxx>G.John Boggio</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October 06, 1999 3:04
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: ADMIN: Realtraders
Forum</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Every piece of junk e-mail I get, I block. If you have
Microsoft's internet<BR>explorer 5.0 click on the offending e-mail, go into
messages, and click<BR>"BLOCK SENDER", any and all messages sent will be
blocked now and forever.<BR>Happy trading.<BR>----- Original Message
-----<BR>From: MS <<A
href="mailto:mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>To:
G.John Boggio <<A
href="mailto:boggio@xxxxxxxxx";>boggio@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Cc: <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>Sent:
Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:55 AM<BR>Subject: Re: ADMIN: Realtraders
Forum<BR><BR><BR>> John,<BR>> Thank you, I'm hoping you are warning the
peps who are trafficking in<BR>junk. I'm<BR>> suggesting three strikes and
you are out of here, my vote.<BR>> mark seflin<BR>><BR>> "G.John
Boggio" wrote:<BR>><BR>> > Finally, over the last
few days there has been a lot of (what I<BR>> > consider) private and/or
junk (non-trading related) messages sent to the<BR>> > Forum. As
we go forward, please refrain from sending such posts to the<BR>> >
Forum as it ties up bandwidth and interrupts the valuable flow
of<BR>"Trading<BR>> > related"
messages.<BR>><BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Oct 06 14:42:43 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA30421
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 12:45:19 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id LAA15421
for realtraders-sendemout; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id LAA15395
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lego.zianet.com (lego.zianet.com [204.134.124.54])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id LAA26725
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [204.134.124.26] by lego.zianet.com (NTMail 4.20.0009/NT1100.00.c5a99e31) with ESMTP id svcciaaa for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 12:29:37 -0600
Received: from ruidoso0185.zianet.com (ruidoso0185.zianet.com [207.66.42.194]) by nova.zianet.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id na499889 for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 6 Oct 1999 12:22:58 -0600
Message-ID: <01c101bf1028$e1648220$c22a42cf@xxxxxx>
From: "Earl Adamy" <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <199910061655.KAA04139@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to protect assets
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 12:06:14 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Rates have historically gone to near or even below zero in both US and Japan
following market crash... in both cases borrowers _paid_ to put their money
in short term treasuries i.e. they bought treasuries from government at a
premium. Imagine too that the few remaining stockholders actually demanded
dividends 3 to 5 times the yield available on intermediate and long term
treasuries (illustration of how pendulum swings from one excess to another).
I did not say that capital gains from lower rates would outweigh the ability
of the government to print money but given it should. You don't have to be a
fundamentalist to understand this stuff, just consult some very long term
historical charts.
Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Fritz <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: How to protect assets
> Earl wrote:
> > I have studied this off and on in some detail over the past few
> > years and my most educated conclusion is that intermediate to long
> > term US treasuries should provide the greatest safety and highest
> > return.
>
> I didn't expect that answer AT ALL. So you feel the rates are likely
> to go way down, thus increasing value of the bonds? And you expect
> that increase to outweigh the losses to inflation or other attacks on
> the dollar's value?
>
> I don't know what to expect on this. Rates up or down, inflation or
> deflation, I really don't have a good feel for which way it is likely
> to go when everything goes boom. I wish I understood the mechanics
> better. This is one time when this technical trader wishes he had a
> better fundamental background.
|