[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: BULLETIN- GOLD UP $12 AFTER COMEX CLOSE- HANNIBALS FLEEING - TOM CRUISE


  • To: <warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: BULLETIN- GOLD UP $12 AFTER COMEX CLOSE- HANNIBALS FLEEING - TOM CRUISE
  • From: "Judith Gledhill / Mark Oliver" <gledhill@xxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:15:15 -0700

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

oh dear this is getting tragic are we now supposed to feel sorry becoz
investment banks are abt to get royally bathed......... i mean its not
aproblem when the little guys get stuffed but heavens above if the rocket
scientists are getting embalmed its a manipulation hahhahhahahhahahh wake up
my frd
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew <warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: BULLETIN- GOLD UP $12 AFTER COMEX CLOSE- HANNIBALS
FLEEING - TOM CRUISE


>So what makes this upmove not a manipulation to squeeze the shorts?
>
>At 08:55 PM 10/4/99 -0700, Larry Muir wrote:
>>To anybody who doesn't like gold market information DON'T READ THIS
>>and don't send me your hate mail  just skip this
>>this is educational so it won't interest you.
>>I would like to share this letter I was sent because this a huge historic
>>event in the markets. I thought what gata was saying made sense and it
looks
>>like they were accurate. As far as trading goes I would say being long
gold
>>could be profitable.
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't read past this point if you are not interested in something
>>educational
>>>Many of you know that there are a gazillion
>>>390 Dec Comex calls outstanding. We know for a
>>>fact that most of them are uncovered calls. A well
>>>known floor trader told me that if $390 is taken
>>>out to the upside, the Comex could be in VERY
>>>SERIOUS TROUBLE.
>
>
>