|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Wouldn't it be wonderful if mail lists could ascertain the age of those
subscribing and limit those who are allowed on the list to a maturity level
of say, the average 8 yr old? Nothing in this post is true and worse, it
is a foundless tirade at the foundation of our current unemployment rate
which equals the lowest rates in 30 yrs. Maybe even low enough that our
Mr Taylor will find a job when he grows up.
Bob
At 08:05 PM 10/4/99 -0700, James Taylor wrote:
>If the scum-sucker Greenspan has any spine at all, he will raise tomorrow,
>and catch the gambling public flat-footed. This 'man' (and I use the term
>loosely) will be hated by tens of millions of American's when this ponzi
>scheme finally ends. A heck of a lot of innocent, hard-working citizens
>will be hurt by his past bubble cultivation. When the blind-sided public
>end up unemployed, their families put on the street, and hungry, this joker
>will think long and hard about the choices he made. I wouldn't want to be
>him. Rednecks don't act rationally when they are hungry and cold.
>
>Signed,
>an informed student of economics and government mismanagement and deception
>
>-------------
>
>At 09:42 PM 10/4/99 -0400, RAY RAFFURTY wrote:
>>Hi Gary,
>>
>>Actually, to get a jump on the Fed. meeting tune into CNBC at about 8:00 AM
>>EST for Mr. Greenspan's briefcase indicator. It has been correct something
>>like 18 out of the last 19 times. {;-)
>>
>> Good luck and good trading,
>>
>> Ray Raffurty
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Gary Fritz <fritz@xxxxxxxx>
>>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 4:34 PM
>>Subject: FOMC meeting?
>>
>>
>>> I'm holding a long position into tomorrow and I figured I'd check...
>>>
>>> The FOMC meeting starts tommorrow morning at 0900 ET. But there is
>>> usually not any impact from the *start* of the meeting, right? Any
>>> fireworks, if any are to happen, shouldn't launch until they announce
>>> on Thursday at 1400 ET?
>>>
>>> The market doesn't seem to think Mr. G. will drop any bombs on
>>> Thursday, given the run-up since Friday afternoon. Anybody want to
>>> hazard any predictions?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|