|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
| -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
| Von: Jdonato98@xxxxxxx [SMTP:Jdonato98@xxxxxxx]
| Gesendet am: Monday, October 04, 1999 2:25 PM
| An: admagic@xxxxxxxx; realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| Betreff: Re: MA's in the S&P 500
|
| Brian,
| I have tried every type of MA and MACD on all the indexes, and to date, have
| not been very succesful.
| <snip> but very useful system.
|
| All the Best,
| Jerry Donato
Sounds like a contradiction to me? why beat a dead horse?
GwennFrom ???@??? Mon Oct 04 09:48:24 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA02014
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 09:42:21 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id JAA25145
for realtraders-sendemout; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 09:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA25128
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout0.01019freenet.de (mout0.01019freenet.de [62.104.201.5])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA18553
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 09:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [62.104.201.6] (helo=mx0.01019freenet.de)
by mout0.01019freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
id 11YAho-0006mh-00; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 18:11:16 +0200
Received: from [212.81.141.166] (helo=frankfurt.netsurf.de)
by mx0.01019freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
id 11YAhn-0001Ji-00; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 18:11:15 +0200
Message-ID: <37F8D200.983A52F1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 12:12:48 -0400
From: Daniel Goncharoff <Daniel.Goncharoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Baker <chrisbak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Real Traders <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GEN: Stop me before I day Trade again!
References: <4.1.19991004070528.00bab330@xxxx> <v04210105b41e6d5ca60d@[140.239.87.114]> <006a01bf0e7d$b3a59f60$6033da18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Actually, the Dow will under perform the 'average' big cap, because of the
effect of splits; stocks that climb and then declare a split are 'reweighted'
according to their new stock price relative to the old, ie, a stock that splits
3 for 1 has only 1/3 the weight in the Dow it had before the split.
Regards
DanG
Chris Baker wrote:
> I've always thought that capitalization-weighted indices like the S&P 500
> and Nas 100 will do better than the average stock, as stocks with increasing
> market capitalization are given more weight in the index. The Dow however
> will perform more like an average big-cap stock.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Fulks <bfulks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Alexander Levitin <alevitin@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: GEN: Stop me before I day Trade again!
>
> > At 7:30 AM -0700 10/4/99, Alexander Levitin wrote:
> >
> > >Take a look at the monthly charts of a good stock (companies that
> > >have real product, real market share, real earnings). They advance
> > >for many many years. Just imagine that you "ride" a portion of this
> > >advance, then sold it when the company or industry are in a
> > >"fundamental" decline. Those stocks do not double in price, the
> > >minimum I have notice was 6 times increase, ten to twenty times
> > >increase in price is more typical.
> >
> > It is easy to locate the "good stocks" after they have increased six-fold.
> >
> > But it is well known that almost all professional stock pickers do
> > more poorly than the market averages so it cannot be all that easy to
> > find which stocks will be the good ones before the fact.
> >
> > Bob Fulks
> >
|