|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<P>Stig O wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>There are
some interesting coincidences with regard to the recent goldprice.Or is
it the Natural Order we are witnessing?</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>The
green line is the Main resistance line from the 1980 high.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT SIZE=-1><FONT COLOR="#000000">Magenta lines are Andrews Pitchfork
from the 1980 high and 1985 low. It's offset by 50% (a function in Dynamic
Trader).</FONT>The line acting as resistance to present price is the 1st
warning line in the Pitchfork
( "
" "
)</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>The blue lines are Andrews
Pitchfork from the 1993 low to1996 high. also offset 50%.</FONT></FONT>
<FONT SIZE=-1>You may also remember the Gann fan lines posted in my last
goldchart.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>There is no doubt in my mind that if we
break the resistance in the 330 area, we are in for a bullrun that will
parallell the DM run from 1985.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>Have a nice weekend,</FONT>
<FONT SIZE=-1>stig</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1><FONT COLOR="#000000">Just as a
though experiment...... couldn it be possible that an upmove from ANY bottom
at this time would have stopped at 328 anyway.</FONT>I mean, if we hadn't
had this last "manipulation" move down to 255, then the spike up wouldn't
have been so large.In other words the harm done to the "manipulators" was
self inflicted. (so what?)</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>The word "manipulator"
should be understood as small group of people with ample money resources
to move markets. it does not imply any moral values at all.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>But
it's interesting to see how the natural order MUST run it's course.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Hmmmmmmmmm, perhaps I should only post
the charts and leave out the comments.......<g></FONT></FONT>
Stig,
<BR> What if the manipulation was the move up in Gold prices?
The Bank of England and some other central banks decide they want to dump
their gold. So, they get together the major gold dealers and work out a
plan so they can all make a nice chunk of money. The gold dealers take
on a big chunk of gold and then have their press release that they won't
be having any more unscheduled gold sales. What the heck does "unscheduled"
mean? I am sure that most of the time most of their sales are "scheduled".
I have no evidence, but this whole thing smells just like the Warren Bufftet
silver buying announcement. Silver ran for about one week after Buffet
said he was buying silver. One week later and that was the top. Guess who
was selling silver during that final run?
<P> My guess is that when we look back on this in six month, the
gold rally will have turned out to be an excellent shorting opportunity.
Count me not a bull on bullion.
<P>Cynically,
<P>Pyrite Pete
<BR>AKA Norman
<P>P.S. I see nothing in the planetary cycles that would have supported
this Gold rally. That says to me that it is bogus and will fail.
<BR>
<BR>
<P>Stig O wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>There are
some interesting coincidences with regard to the recent goldprice.</FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Or
is it the Natural Order we are witnessing?</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>The
green line is the Main resistance line from the 1980 high.</FONT></FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Magenta
lines are Andrews Pitchfork from the 1980 high and 1985 low. It's offset
by 50% (a function in Dynamic Trader).</FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE=-1>The line
acting as resistance to present price is the 1st warning line in the Pitchfork
( "
" "
)</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>The blue lines are Andrews
Pitchfork from the 1993 low to1996 high. also offset 50%.</FONT></FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>You
may also remember the Gann fan lines posted in my last goldchart.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>There
is no doubt in my mind that if we break the resistance in the 330 area,
we are in for a bullrun that will parallell the DM run from 1985.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>Have
a nice weekend,</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>stig</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Just
as a though experiment...... couldn it be possible that an upmove from
ANY bottom at this time would have stopped at 328 anyway.</FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE=-1>I
mean, if we hadn't had this last "manipulation" move down to 255, then
the spike up wouldn't have been so large.</FONT><FONT SIZE=-1>In other
words the harm done to the "manipulators" was self inflicted. (so what?)</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>The
word "manipulator" should be understood as small group of people with ample
money resources to move markets. it does not imply any moral values at
all.</FONT> <FONT SIZE=-1>But it's interesting to see how the natural
order MUST run it's course.</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Hmmmmmmmmm,
perhaps I should only post the charts and leave out the comments.......<g></FONT></FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR> </BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Oct 02 08:03:20 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA28362
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:47:58 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id FAA27549
for realtraders-sendemout; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id FAA27527
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pro.fais.net (mail.fais.net [204.214.94.251])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id FAA18357
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from charlesm (94-147.lgtch01.fais.net [204.214.94.147])
by pro.fais.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA07839;
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 07:25:40 -0500
Message-ID: <001001bf0cd1$bf679cc0$935ed6cc@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "charles meyer" <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx>
From: "charles meyer" <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx>
To: <VALIALLAH@xxxxxxx>, <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Van tharp's how to develop a winning trading system
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 07:29:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Ismail:
If the information accomplished what it states it would be a heck
of a deal. That's the appeal and the clever wording. I had a
friend who went to the seminar and from what I could tell all he
got were handouts that could be gleened from books.
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: VALIALLAH@xxxxxxx <VALIALLAH@xxxxxxx>
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 01, 1999 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: Van tharp's how to develop a winning trading system
>if you have either purchased the audio tapes
>"how to develop a winning trading system that fits you"
>or attended this seminar , i'd appreciate your input
>thanks
>ismail
>
|