[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Best listed options brokers in Germany?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Anyone on these lists have an opinion on who are the better brokers for 
institutionals on the German listed derivatives markets?

Thanks

Gwenn From ???@??? Tue Sep 28 06:42:16 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA29362
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:47:09 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id AAA06560
	for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id AAA06543
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr (esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr [158.156.156.29])
	by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id AAA01732
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (esmailfed2 [158.156.1.207])
	by esrelay002.caissedesdepots.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA24041;
	Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:04:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cmi.cdc.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by esmailfed2.serv.cdc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA18101;
	Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:10:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Posted-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:10:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from eiche by cmi.cdc.fr (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA04256; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:07:45 +0200
Received: from ncc183 by eiche (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA22080; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:07:44 +0200
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:07:03 +0100
Message-ID: <01BF0990.D46EE040.ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Gwenael Gautier <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ggautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'List Get'" <get@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'List Omega'" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
        "'List RT'" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Best listed options brokers in Germany?
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:07:02 +0100
Organization: CDC Marches FKT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MimeMultipartBoundary"
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:   

Anyone on these lists have an opinion on who are the better brokers for 
institutionals on the German listed derivatives markets?

Thanks

Gwenn From ???@??? Tue Sep 28 06:42:43 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA30642
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 04:26:05 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id DAA09616
	for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
	by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id DAA09601
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnct.com (earth.cnct.com [165.254.118.23])
	by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id DAA20425
	for <Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dow-jones (ts1-1.ny.cnct.com [207.111.66.101])
	by cnct.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id GAA14055;
	Tue, 28 Sep 1999 06:55:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19990928064400.006ccc04@xxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: ritchie@xxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 06:44:00 -0400
To: get@xxxxxxxxxxx, Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: ritchie <ritchie@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 
In-Reply-To: <19990927.230515.9830.0.margeketter@xxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:   

For whatever it is worth

Start of Forwarded message via Prodigy Mail >>

From:	 (BCXT38A) MARTIN HEIMS
Subject:	 From the Judge
Date:	 09/26
Time:	 10:49 PM

Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay on-line 
and
continue using email: The last few months have revealed an alarming
trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly 
push
through legislation that will affect your use of the Internet. Under
proposed legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be attempting to 
bill
email users out of "alternate postage fees".

Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt. to charge a 5 cent surcharge 

on
every email delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at 
source.
The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington D.C.


lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this 
legislation
from becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming that lost 
revenue
due to the proliferation of email is costing nearly $230,000,000 in
revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign 
"There
is nothing like a letter".

Since the average citizen received about 10 pieces of email per day 
in
1998, the cost to the typical individual would be an additional 50 
cents
per day, or over $180 dollars per year, above and beyond their
regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money paid directly 
to
the U.S. Postal Service for a service they do not even provide. The
whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. If the
federal government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by 
adding a
surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already
paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic
efficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be 
delivered

from New York to Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to
tinker with email, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in 
the
United States. One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested 
a
"twenty to forty dollar per month surcharge on all Internet service"
above and beyond the government's proposed email charges.
Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story, the
only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of 
email
surcharge "a useful concept whose time has come" (March 6th 1999
Editorial) Don't sit by and watch your freedom erode away!
Send this email to all Americans on your list and tell your friends 
and
relatives to write to their congressman and say "No!" to Bill 602P.

Kate Turner Assistant to Richard Stepp, Berger, Stepp and Gorman
Attorneys at Law
216 Concorde Street, Vienna, VA

URGENT!!!! Pass this along to all your email buddies -



<Internet Distribution List>
TO: sdheims@xxxxxxxxx


<Distribution List>
	(BCXT38C), name unlisted                      
	cc:(BCXT38A), MARTIN HEIMS                       


<< End of Forwarded message >>