PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The second chart has also been posted previously. It is
the end of day cumulative volume chart that was projecting a proportional drop
in the INDU to 10,202. Today's close was 10,318.59. There is no
reason to expect a one for one proportional relationship, its just an
approximation thing. Also the thinking was that when the RSI INDU and RSI
EODCV converged in oversold area a trading low would be nearby. They have
converged and the EODCV has actually formed a divergence with its RSI. The
INDU closed on its 200 day average. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>BobR</FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Sep 23 20:04:37 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA32529
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 20:05:13 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id TAA02633
for realtraders-sendemout; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id TAA02619
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id TAA25513
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ibm (1Cust237.tnt1.blythe.ca.da.uu.net [208.252.4.237])
by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA17811
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <033401bf0633$a79323c0$038dfea9@xxx>
From: "ROBERT ROESKE" <bobrabcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "realtraders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MKT - INDU, EODCV
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:22:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0330_01BF05F8.F67D5360"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The second chart has also been posted previously. It is
the end of day cumulative volume chart that was projecting a proportional drop
in the INDU to 10,202. Today's close was 10,318.59. There is no
reason to expect a one for one proportional relationship, its just an
approximation thing. Also the thinking was that when the RSI INDU and RSI
EODCV converged in oversold area a trading low would be nearby. They have
converged and the EODCV has actually formed a divergence with its RSI. The
INDU closed on its 200 day average. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>BobR</FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Eodcv21.gif"
|