[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The "Trader Status" audit



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 9/20/99 4:09:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, CalaxCorp writes:

<< 
 1.  Would paying a 20% profit share out of one's IRA account to himself or 
his corporation be a "related party transaction"?  Could you clarify if this 
is a "prohibitive transaction" or not?
 
 2.  Would the person or his corporation sharing the trading profit be 
subject to CTA registration rules if the trades are in the futures markets?
 
 Thank you in advance for your clarification.
  >>

You raise an interesting point, in fact, that was what I had in mind when I 
said "I wasn't sure that this thing would fly", relating to the issues 
surrounding the related parties and disqualified transactions. I did look 
into it a bit further as a result of your email, and found that it probably 
would pass muster, although it does involve a "Disqualified Person" who owns 
the corp. There is an exception to the rule even for disqualified persons.  
Code section 4975 addresses prohibited transactions, and disqualified 
persons.  Code Section 4975(d)(10) though gives some exceptions to this and 
it lists the following scenerio. Even though this arrangement is between 
related parties and what would be a disqualified person, the transaction 
would not be prohibited if "the compensation were reasonable for services 
provided, and if the person who received the compensation was not already on 
salary from the company that had established the plan".  It looks like there 
is an exception here under which this strategy could be enacted. As long as 
the compensation was reasonable, and the person trading the plan was not 
collecting double salary there is nothing apparent that flags it as a 
prohibited transaction..

As far as your second question goes, with the CTA regisrtation issue, I don't 
believe unless a certain amount of money is managed, or if the number of 
accounts exceeds a certain amount, that registration is necessary. But then 
again I am not a compliance guy, just a tax specialist. You would need to 
check with a compliance lawyer or specialst in the area to make sure, but I 
don't think so.

Regards
Ted Tesser