[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sp500


  • To: JCDuffy@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: sp500
  • From: Ira Tunik <ist@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:48:14 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <d5069d17.250a6c43@xxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

It is nice to be able to agree with Mr. Duffey for once.  The greatest asset that
a tout or prediction or guesstimate has is to stimulate thought.  Many times
there is an Item I have not bothered to look at for an extended period of time.
Or a stock I didn't even know existed.  The prognostication or question will
force me to look at something I normally wouldn't.  I will then look at it and
make a trading decision based upon my system and what I feel it will do.
Sometimes I agree with the one who posted and at times I may take a position
diametrically opposed to that noted.   But a service has been done for me by the
poster.  Ira

JCDuffy@xxxxxxx wrote:

> The comments below were NOT directed at a Tom (I think Ben wrote the post I
> replied to). I don't know anything about Profittaker. I only know he is right
> most of the time. Therefore I think his opinion, whatever it is based on, is
> worth something. Just me though. Some people need to know exactly what he is
> doing. I respect that. Others need to respect the fact a track record is
> enough for some to consider his forecasts quite a useful tool--- regardless
> of his methodologies. As to why not share?--- the answer is it takes many
> years and many thousands of dollars to  learn what he has--- giving it away
> for free would be a bit much to ask. He is already giving me a "hand up". I
> personally would not feel right about then asking for a "hand out".
>
> ancroft@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> <<
>  I think the only point Tom was making is this:  if you are going to make
> predictions, why not share the methodology that allowed
>  you to make the prediction?  Don't get defensive, just tell us why we should
> believe the forecast.  For example, what is
>  Profittaker?  What methodology does it use?  We are not asking for trade
> secrets, just some background information.  Thanks.
>
>  Bill Bancroft >>