|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Here is an article I found on the web. From my personal experience I am
convince there is indeed quite a potential.
Gwenn
The Roaring Dragon
by Jim Rogers
SHANGHAI, China --- Today I did something I've contemplated doing for decades:
I walked into a Chinese brokerage house in Shanghai and
opened a brokerage account so I could buy Chinese equities. Paige and I entered
China on the first of April across the Kazakhstan-Chinese
border. We drove eastward across the Gobi Desert, along SOME excellent roads,
stopping along the route---Yining, Urumqi, Hami, Lanzhou,
and Xi'an---that I've taken twice before on journeys over the past eleven
years. Despite the widespread reports in the western press about how
poorly China is doing economically, our eyes told us a different story. Hami,
which in 1988 had a way in and out that was more a boulder-strewn
path than a road, has turned into a boomtown, packed with trucks, cars, and
motorcycles-as well as goats, geese, and cattle. In 1990 there were
no dealers for motorcycles; today there are three. In Yining street markets
were everywhere, and its streets, too, were filled with vehicular traffic.
Where before there were only a few state shops, now private shops proliferate.
In 1990 there were no gas stations; once I was forced to go to a
Red Army outpost and beg for gas. On this trip we've found an abundance of
secular temples to gasoline, elaborate service stations with ten
pumps and enough arches to rival McDonald's. In Xi'an we even found several
Mercedes. In 1990 there was but a budding hotel industry; today
there are three times as many hotels, many up to world standards. As for
nightlife, in Hami and elsewhere there are many discos, karaoke bars,
and nightclubs. Young men are dressed in suits and ties; only the older crowd
wear Mao suits. The western press wants to make much of the lack
of human rights in China, but in 8,000 kilometers of travel we were stopped
only a couple of times at checkpoints, whereas as we crossed the
Stans-our fast allies-we were stopped scores and scores of times by
heavy-handed police. Here in China everyone is too busy making money to
poke his nose into anyone else's business. Today China is all construction,
markets, and factories. Looking east from our hotel room in Nanjing,
the old southern capital, we counted twelve separate cranes working at
skyscraper sites, not that there was any shortage of skyscrapers.
Everywhere the Chinese are feverishly building highways, houses, shops, and
factories. Many of the roads are as good as the Autobahn - and
much of all this has been built by hand, just as were the Grand Canal and the
Great Wall a couple thousand years ago. Along all the roads in every
town and village we found constant activity, bustling markets, Chinese eagerly
working, buying and selling at every turn, and an astonishing array of
new consumer goods-bicycles, radios, trucks, cars, TVs, clothes-made by both
foreign and domestic manufacturers. You name the consumer
good, and the Chinese are buying and selling it. China is by far the most
dynamic country we've encountered, making the boomtimes in Ireland and
Turkey pale in comparison. On my previous visits I stopped at a temple or two,
but never had a sense they were too important to the Chinese. No
longer: we are constantly running into packed Buddhist, Taoist, and Confucian
temples, and the surprise is the extent of the crowds. An additional
surprise is the sheer number of thriving mosques and Christian churches. We've
stumbled onto several churches with vibrant congregations. I never
know who is the more startled: Paige and I or the worshippers-some of whose
families have been Christian for 200 years. We have yet to find
anyone of any faith who is feeling repressed. Some of the oldest members can
remember problems under Mao, but the younger ones are
bewildered by the question. All in all I am sure there are some rights'
violations; they exist in every country, especially in developing countries.
Even
Plato wrote about them as long ago as The Republic. My sense after six weeks
close to the ground, however, is that the human rights' tempest in
the West is a cover for those with some other agenda, such as protecting their
own interests from a dynamic new country. How did China get
here? Its recent history is fascinating. Starting in
1978 its leadership has moved the economy from Soviet-style central planning to
more of a market-based economy, yet all within Communist
Party political control. In place of collectivization in agriculture, national
leadership has stressed "household responsibility," allowing households to
produce and sell, which has boosted farm production tremendously. In the same
way, local officials and plant managers have been allowed far
more control over their domains, and Beijing opened up the country to foreign
investment. The result has been a quadrupling of gross domestic
product over the past 20 years, with both agriculture and industry making
enormous strides. The World Bank estimates that China's GDP might
have been as high as $4.25 trillion in 1997. While successful overall, from
this uniquely Chinese stew has sometimes come the worst of both
systems. From the constraints of the Communist Party have come corruption and
the petty hassles of bureaucracy, while capitalism has brought
inflation and the corrupting influence of windfall gains. Between
1992 and 1997 growth reached levels as high as 10% annually, particularly along
the prosperous coast.
The government, with some of the best national leadership in China's history,
has had its work cut out for it. Tens of millions of surplus rural
workers have floated between the villages, towns, and cities, sustained only
with low-paying part-time work. The Chinese leaders have struggled
to keep afloat the large state-owned enterprises, few of which have grown with
the rest of the country. In addition, it's been hard for the national
government to collect the revenues it felt it needed. On top of these problems,
the leadership has not only struggled to reduce corruption and other
economic crimes but also to contain the deterioration of the environment-air
pollution, soil erosion, and the steady fall of the water table in the
north. Will there be continued tensions between the Communist Party and the
decentralized economic system? Absolutely. How will they be
resolved? I believe in favor of increasing prosperity, as under Mao the Chinese
tried central economic planning for decades and they know it won't
work, just as after seven decades of socialism the peoples of South America
came to lose their capacity to believe in economic poppycock. So
now that I've seen a country bursting with the capitalist spirit and opened my
brokerage account, what stocks might I buy? In China there are two
major exchanges, the first here in Shanghai and the other, south of us in
Shenzhen, on both of which a total of some 500 Chinese stocks trade.
Many of these are not stocks I want to buy; they are the leftovers from the
Communist era, poorly-run government companies the authorities are
eager to unload on unsuspecting investors. And of course there are other
impediments. The equity shares of Chinese public companies are divided
into A and B shares. The A-shares can only be owned by native Chinese. If they
are careful how they go about it, these shares can also be owned
by the overseas Chinese, who number many tens of millions around the world.
Foreign investors who play it straight---that is, who don't use a
Chinese nominee to trade or invest---are only allowed to purchase B-shares. At
this writing the foreigners' B-shares are not convertible into
A-shares. Whereas at one time western enthusiasm for China was so large that
B-shares sold at a premium to A-shares, today Western pessimism
toward China is so great that these B-shares have fallen 85% from their highs.
Such a huge discrepancy has whetted my appetite-what a bargain!
Since the Asian economic turmoil began in mid-1997, I've been watching and
asking when would be the right time to plunge back into Asian
equities. I now believe that time is close at hand. My view of the rally over
the past few months is that it's a bear-market rally, that we will have
another bottom, a second bottom, that will tell us that the Asian market is
truly ready to march upwards. My long observations of major bear
markets tells me there is often a second major leg down, one which tests the
prior bottom, and shakes out those who have been suckered into the
first rally. I've thought this second leg down might be marked by the
devaluation of the Chinese currency or some other turmoil in China-say, labor
unrest and strikes. Some years ago the Chinese formed International Trust and
Investment Corporations (ITICs), government-backed investment
companies, usually one to a province. These raised billions of dollars to
develop much-needed Chinese infrastructure: airports, toll roads, sea
ports, and especially power plants. Their bonds typically paid a high rate, 15%
to 18%. However, these trusts made the age-old banker's mistake,
lending long and borrowing short. ITICs were usually owned by the local
provincial governments, and sometimes appeared to be guaranteed by
the government, just as in the U. S. agency bonds appear to be backed by the
full faith and credit of the U. S. Treasury but are not. Investors'
arguments for trusting in such semi-guarantees are that the governments
involved would be too embarrassed to let such bonds default. One of these
ITICs was the Guangdong International Trust and Investment Corporation, GITIC,
located in one of the most prosperous Chinese provinces. At a
creditors' meeting in January GITIC announced it had $4.3 billion in
liabilities and no assets with which to cover these debts, and that it was
filing
for bankruptcy. The next day the Guangdong authorities announced they weren't
going to meet any obligation they might have had to guarantee the
losses. Over the past few months other ITICs have made similar announcements,
and the national government has repudiated any responsibility to
bail them out.
Overseas investment houses, some of whom are insurance companies, have had to
reserve massively, sometimes writing off the investment entirely,
which will wipe out years of profits earned from China and put a sour taste in
their mouths for more Chinese investment. The way the collapse of
GITIC was handled alarmed some of China's big banks, which have alerted the
government that this will damage Chinese credibility abroad and
hamper Chinese prospects of raising funds in international markets. They were
right enough. Since January international investing in China has
backed up. In fact, much of the early money into China has not been the wisest
of money. Iveco, the Italian truck manufacturer, put its first agent in
China in
1984. After investing $200 million along the way, it won't see any profits
until 2002, almost 20 years after its agent's first arrival. Unilever arrived
during the 80s, too, and it, too, had to waive its usual investment criteria to
justify the millions it spent in China. General Motors and western banks
later poured more money into the country, but the gold rush has now come to an
end. January and February of this year show a 9.5% decline in
foreign direct investment from last year, raising the possibility that in 1999,
for the first time in this decade, investment in China from outside may
fall. Indeed, Beijing officials are now saying that direct foreign investment
may slump to $15 billion from last year's high of $45 billion. For a long
time there's been a myth that a global consumer company couldn't afford not to
be in China; but as the losses mount many Western companies'
boards are asking if they can afford to be in China at all. Those who rushed to
be "first to the honeypot" have not found that establishing a brand
has won them the riches that it earlier promised; in China as in other markets
brand loyalty is fluid. Indeed, several western businesses have pulled
out of China recently: the Royal Bank of Canada, Southwestern Bell, Marks &
Spencer, and Fosters of Australia. Many new projects have been
put on hold. The hype about a market with hundreds of millions of eager
consumers has encountered the reality that perhaps only millions want
certain western products. Many companies have begun to regard China much as
they regard any other country opportunity, as one with risks that
might well not pay off. They've learnt that not all joint ventures work, and
that all too many local partners may not be experienced in industries new
to the country. These pioneers didn't reckon, either, with the intensity of the
local competition, nor with the government's "buy China" policies for
many industries. While China has made repeated promises not to devalue its
currency, it's hard to see how the national government can fail to
devalue with all the Asian regional pressures on its value, and that prospect,
too, has made foreigners cautious. Without foreign investment, not as
many Chinese jobs will be created, which naturally will have an impact on the
Gross National Product. In addition, without a positive attitude
toward Chinese investment those in our investment and political circles will
lean more toward the containment of China rather than engagement with
it. It's a shame Clinton didn't make the WTO deal with China on Prime Minister
Zhu Rongji's visit to the U. S., as it would have done much to
rebuilt the confidence of the foreign investment community toward China. While
many foreigners who have invested in China may have lost money
through ill-conceived investments, you'd never believe it by the bustling
economic activity we observed on our cross-China journey. For a long,
long time I've been enthusiastic about China's prospects. For many years I've
urged my friends to teach their children Chinese, as I believe the 21st
century will be as much China's as the 19th century was Britain's and the 20th
century was America's. For all these years I've been waiting
patiently for the hibernating dragon to awaken. Well, here at the end of the
century and the beginning of a new millennium the huge dragon-slightly
smaller in land mass than the United States but with more than four times our
population-has awakened. To prepare for the right moment, which
could be as early as this fall, I'm compiling a shopping list of those Chinese
companies in which I will invest. I'm leaving off the inefficient holdovers
from communist days, those giant labor-intensive companies that will never show
a profit and whose going public was only a way of getting them
off the government's hands. As examples, I'm looking at a land company with
huge holdings in raw land in the new part of Shanghai, a tire and
rubber company, an appliance company, and a glass company. Nothing high-tech
here, but well-established companies in basic industries that will
meet the emerging Chinese middle-class desire for a better life. Tire and
rubber may seem hum-drum to those whose portfolios are filled with
Amazon.com and AOL, but when you've traveled across the breadth of China today
and encountered thousands upon thousands of rubber-tired
vehicles-cars, motorcycles, and trucks-the Chinese now employ, you come to
believe that rubber mountains of tires will be sold. My visits to the
stock exchange and the brokerages here have taught me a several interesting
things. Everybody in the stock-market business here is young,
including the president of the stock exchange. This is a new business, one that
didn't exist ten to fifteen years ago, and the people in it are like those
in software and the internet in America-no one is over 35. They are full of the
get-up and go of youth, too, eagerly accepting challenges and long
hours. I'm not actually buying any stocks yet, simply mapping out my strategy.
I'm watching and waiting for the Chinese to work out their two
major problems. Their currency is not yet convertible, which will keep foreign
investors from plunging in again. Once the currency issue is resolved,
the artificial division between the A- and the B-shares-which if it were
dissolved today would give Chinese citizens a way of sending money out of
the country-should also come to be resolved. However, the most telling piece of
information I've learned here is that the government is trying to
make the ownership of stock shares more attractive to its citizens. Over the
decades of my investing life, I've seen it over and over: When a
government creates incentives-real incentives-for people to buy stocks, they
always go up. It's particularly exciting when as here there's a high
savings rate, and the banks are loaded with cash. The banks have grown
cautious recently and won't lend, so that these savings are trapped in the
banks. If China's citizens are genuinely encouraged to take their money out of
the banks and buy equities, the market will soar. This could happen
as early as this summer, but it might take until the end of the year for all
this to occur. Remember, too, that these are only two small exchanges with
no more than 500 stocks---and that the local population is 1.2-billion Chinese!
So, I'm waiting for the Chinese to allow its currency to float against
other currencies and for stock-market incentives that are rumored to come to
become real. One or both should happen this year. And how might
an American investor take advantage of these opportunities? An approach I'm
exploring is investing in companies domiciled in overseas Chinese
communities such as Bangkok, Singapore, Vancouver, etc. that do business in
China or with the Chinese. The Chinese consider the overseas
Chinese almost the same as themselves, giving those outside the country a leg
up on other nationalities. Find a few of these companies in which to
invest and the alert investor will have found an entry point into the Chinese
market. How else to invest? In addition to various Asian mutual funds,
I'm reminded of what John Templeton did in 1942. The stock market in New York
was depressed because of the Great Depression and World
War II. With a modest amount of money Templeton bought 100 shares of each of
the stocks on the New York Stock Exchange that were selling
for less than $1.00. He held on to them for a good long while, and although
some of these companies didn't survive, he had bought the vast bulk so
cheaply that he made a fortune. Today many Chinese B-shares sell on the New
York Stock Exchange as ADRs for small sums. A similar strategy
might be to buy all these stocks and hold them through thick and thin. In five,
ten, fifteen years there's an excellent chance that this will be one of the
best investments an investor will ever make. , the end ,From ???@??? Tue Aug 24 08:15:48 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA02423
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 04:57:37 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id DAA18891
for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id DAA18887
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo13.mx.aol.com (imo13.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.3])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id DAA12456
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
Received: from Proffittak@xxxxxxx
by imo13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id yDCIa13735 (3988)
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <97adfa9.24f3d330@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:51:28 EDT
Subject: yearly hi/yearly low
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 214
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
good morning
does anyone have the yearly hi and date and yearly low and date for the dow
in the year 1939
regards
Ben
|