|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3511.1300"' name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Gary,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>You may consider buying ping
plotter for 15.00 (shareware) , you can order it at <A
href="http://www.nessoft.com/pingplotter/alerts.html";>http://www.nessoft.com/pingplotter/alerts.html</A>
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you trade over the internet it can give you a great deal of
information about the quality of your connection. I knew that PMB was having
problems this morning by checking my pingplotter running in the background. In
fact I will not send any orders if pingplotter is 500 or above. I always check
before I trade. I am in the process of having a backup broker in case PMB goes
down and stays down for any length of time.Happy trading.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Gary Kramer <<A
href="mailto:gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>gmkramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Real Traders <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Friday, August 06, 1999 8:35 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re; Online
trading<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><EM>Unfortunately, my electronic entry system goes down from time to
time. Thankfully, I have a backup plan with an actual broker.
This morning, Mark Morrisson at PMB called me to warn me that the system was
down. Although I wish the system never had problems, i am very happy
to know before I try to place the order, that the system will not
work. This is not a one time event. mark has called me in the
past if there are problems. And, when I do call to place an order, he
picks up on the first or second ring. This type of quality service is
more of the exception than the rule. I wish that this industry had
more people like Mark.</EM></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><EM>Gary</EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM></EM> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><EM><BR>Gary Kramer<BR>Oak Park, IL 60302<BR>1-877-866-9761
(Voice mail and Fax)</EM></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Aug 06 10:24:31 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA14978
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 10:23:37 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id JAA16784
for realtraders-sendemout; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA16780
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pro.fais.net (mail2.fais.net [204.214.94.251])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA13562
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from charlesm (ip-94-197.lgtch01.fais.net [204.214.94.197])
by pro.fais.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA06711
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:08:21 -0500
Message-ID: <000901bee025$e3264360$c55ed6cc@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "charles meyer" <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx>
From: "charles meyer" <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx>
To: "REAL TRADERS" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GEN: EWT COUNT?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:08:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
Group:
Upon inspection of a 15 minute chart of the S&P I cannot get
a legitimate count of 5 down waves from the July 19 top through
the low yesterday. My count indicates that if it were a 5- down
count wave 3 would be shorter than both wave 1 and 5. Con-
sequently, I can only get a three down in terms of both price
and time. Yes, there are 5 waves down but the rules don't ap-
pear to verify this as legitimate. Am I wrong? The conclusions
are that this entire correction at worst is not a ziz-zag and down-
side risk is limited in terms of price? That is to say, in EWT
terms we are looking for either a flat or complex correction.
Would someone like to correct my thinking? I am open-minded to other
possibilities.
Charles
|