|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><html>
I don't think the question is why should wreck your economy to save the
world because<br>
the world will go down in flames along with the US's all the same. Does
nobody any good.<br>
A soft landing for the US is in the interest of all. Should be bloody
apparently to Greenspan.<br>
<br>
Does Greenspan want to go down as the guy who created the US bubble that
outdid<br>
Japan's less than a decade after the lessons from Japan became clear to
everyone?<br>
What he wants to do I think is to maximise the economic growth for as
long as possible <br>
and then start the descent. Hold off the hikes as long as possible and
then the inevitable.<br>
<br>
Regarding the deflation arguments against rate hikes. I don't fully grasp
the reasoning.<br>
If there is deflation in Asia, well, after the boom, there's got to be a
bust. Valuation<br>
over reaches itself and then it corrects. That this is problematic for
growth, does not <br>
affect its necessity. My government was telling the people that the real
estate boom(bubble)<br>
was proof that its policies did the people good. It like saying that the
currency is strengthening<br>
and that is proof the economic policies whatever is working.
Strengthening but to what extent?<br>
If it gets too high, exports not going to be competitive and then market
brings it down.<br>
If the rise is artificially supported for a long time, that it has a long
way to go down to correct<br>
for the rise. <br>
<br>
The problem that a currency bust creates, loss of spending power,
increase debt servicing<br>
burden, loss of liquidity, etc, does not mean that it should not
bust.<br>
<br>
What do would happen if you keep monetizing?<br>
<br>
<br>
At 05:26 PM 8/2/99 -0400, Dtrader wrote: <br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>What if it turns out that the Fed now has a
more serious question to face;<br>
an overheated domestic economy with signs of nascent inflation just as
the<br>
economies of (asia, russia, latin america) go in the tank again.<br>
<br>
Will the Fed print money faster, or will they say the party's over,
you're<br>
on your own, we can't wreck our economy so that you don't have to face
your<br>
own structural problems?<br>
<br>
Comments?<br>
</blockquote><br>
<br>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Aug 02 16:56:47 1999
Return-Path: <omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from mx1.eskimo.com (mx1.eskimo.com [204.122.16.48])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30805
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:52:20 -0700
Received: (from smartlst@xxxxxxxxx)
by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id QAA16743;
Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:50:36 -0700
Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:50:35 -0700
Message-Id: <199908022350.HAA19825@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 07:48:34 +0800
To: "CodeList, -" <code-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"OmegaList, -" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"RealTraders List, -" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
TraderWare <traderware-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew <warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Special Upgrade Price
In-Reply-To: <37A61170.C029230F@xxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"Qdv7n2.0.H54.BxYft"@mx1>
Resent-From: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/40253
X-Loop: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Just saw a product called SnapDragon that will chart indicators from Excel.
The impression I got was data to snapdragon to excel back to snapdragon?
Not going to be tick by tick updating if so.
At 05:45 PM 8/2/99 -0400, John O. Romero wrote:
>All I can say, is Omega more than likely will not get any more of my
>money, especially since there are more competitors on the market and
>still more coming on the market. I guess it is time for some serious
>investigation into other products. TraderWare, TradeLab, and Ensign.
>
>John
>
|