|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I know nothing about TS, but Ensign has all of the features one could ask
for. Plus it is updated almost weekly at no cost. Howard is
one of the most accommodating people I have run into as far as helping
subscribers and modifying the program to suit an individuals needs.
If you are interested go to the ensign software site and join the news
group and you find out just what is happening with the program. YOu
can download a trial version and actually work with the prigram for a month.
The only draw back is that it only works with BMI, DTN and e signal, as
far as I know. It is Y2K compatible as is the DOS version. Ira
<p>charles meyer wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> <font color="#000000"><font size=-1>Glenn:</font></font> <font size=-1>I
wonder if Ensign has the same ability as TS regards programmability and</font><font size=-1>availability
of existing indicators and systems. That is to say, pehaps there</font><font size=-1>are
features in TS that can't be transferred to Ensign? Thanks for everyone's</font><font size=-1>feedback
on this issue.</font> <font size=-1>Charles</font>
<blockquote
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><b><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>-----Original
Message-----</font></font></b>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><b>From: </b>Glenn Pederson <gpeder@xxxxxxxxx></font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><b>To: </b>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx></font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><b>Date: </b>Friday, July 30, 1999
10:41 PM</font></font>
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><b>Subject: </b>Switching To Ensign</font></font>
<br> I plan on moving from TradeStation 3.5 to Ensign for Windows.
Any
<br>comments concerning Ensign? From reading Ensign's web site, it
<br>seems like a fairly well thought out program.
<p>Thanks,
<br>
<pre>Glenn Pederson
gpeder@xxxxxxxxx</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jul 31 10:55:19 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA23308
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 10:34:17 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id JAA06794
for realtraders-sendemout; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA06790
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.revealed.net (mail.revealed.net [205.243.76.2])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id JAA13001
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oemcomputer ([208.243.237.231]) by ns.revealed.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-58799U8000L800S0V35)
with SMTP id net; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 11:07:08 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990731110452.013b0eb0@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 11:04:52 -0500
To: d4944@xxxxxxxxxxx, realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: BobsKC <bobskc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GEN: Microsoft and Compaq Admit Vulnerability to Security
Flaws
In-Reply-To: <37A2EEBB.6252@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
At 07:40 AM 7/31/99 -0500, D. Sieler wrote:
>http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/07/biztech/articles/31soft.html
>Reported today in the Times. --- DS
>
>
>>> July 31, 1999
>>>
>>>
>>> Microsoft and Compaq Admit Vulnerability to Security Flaws
>>>
>>> By JOHN MARKOFF and SARA ROBINSON
While all these things are disconcerning, bugs in MSFT products are not new
and in fact, are legendary. The company tends to slap things onto the
market before they are throughly tested and debugged but to their credit,
they do respond quickly to discovered flaws. I personally use Redhat
Linux for many internet activities such as Irc but even though this
operating system is far superior to windows, it is not a point and click
system, meaning one has to actually learn something to use it. It never
crashes and has no security faults but there are few software programs
written for it. (It can best be described as a kin to the old Mircrosoft
DOS). http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletins/ms99-002.asp for
information and patches for the enclosed problems as well as click on The
Microsoft Product Security Information Service to keep yourself well versed
on the latest exploits and getting the patches to fix them almost before
they become a problem.
There are several virii out there that are sent by email or dcc transfer
which allow others access to your machine as well. To insure this doesn't
happen to you, simply never run any .exe file you didn't buy and install
yourself and don't accept dcc transfers from anyone other than your brother
and only then if you returned all his tools.
Good trading to all,
Bob
|