[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: DUCKS, ASTROLOGY, ETC......



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



MRLYNNG@xxxxxxx wrote:

> In a message dated 7/8/99 3:12:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << NW: No,  today - 7/8, was a particularly busy day for Lunar aspects
> occurring
>  during market hours. >>
> ***************************************
> Norman:
> Just a few quick questions.
> (1)  You mentioned the moon and the planets but do you use the MC or Asc
> during the day as they aspect with some of the planets or the moon?

NW: I am familiar with this approach and have tried it with mixed results.
Given the amount of work involved in doing this I decided it wasn't worth my
trouble. But, this could also be a result of an inherent bias resulting from
my having decided to become a longer term trader.

>
> (2)  In your analysis of BDK for TASC, what aspects did you use and what
> weight did you give to the aspects and would you make any changes in
> hindsight?

NW: I used the transits to the Black & Decker incorporation date. I probably
used Mars - Pluto for transits ignoring the faster planets due to their
fleeting influence. As for weights and exact construction of how I do this: A)
C'mon I did that in 1991, am I supposed to remember the exact weights I used
to construct a graph eight years ago? B) Even if I did remember, (I haven't
changed that much in 8 years) it is so simple, if I told you I'd have to shoot
you <G>. So, I must reserve this for my students.

>
> (3)  Have you found any relationship between the planets aspects with each
> other and the lunar aspects that operate during the trading day?

NW: Sorry, I don't think I understand this question.  Aren't they all related
and operate on the same principles?

Norman

>
> Lynn