|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> > . One observation that I have made is that it seem that the skeptics
> > set a higher standard for Astrology than they do for any other form of
> > market analysis
Norman is expressing a thought I always get every time the astrosubject
comes up and it always amazes me.
To those openminded individuals who really wants to expand their horizon I
suggest a visit to Patrick Mikula's webpage, but beware, this guy is
selling something! (although he has a ton of free information on the site).
As a matter of fact he has a 7 lessonns of Introduction to Financial
Astrology.
Lookning through that, you will find that this kind of research is really
nothing else but Geometry, repetitive develoments, statistical
possibillities, and numbers. Excactly the building stones of Technical
Analysis.
Go to www.marketwarrior.com/
On the left hand side, choose AstroTrader
There you choose Section2: Introduction to financial astrology
And voilá there it is
After you have educated youself, try Current Markets on the left hand side.
There we have something for Mr White. Patrick Mikula is sticking his neck
out and suggestion some developments in different markets as well as some
more info.
Try out (on the left hand side) the "Encyclopedia of planetary markets" to
get another free lesson on how to use financial astrology.
If this has ANYTHING in common with reading horoscopes in newspapers,
please let us know.
But before you drop me hate mail( which strangely enough follows, my posts
an financial astrology, by people who have never taken the time to look
into the subject), please take the time to go through the FREE info.
regards
stig
----------
> Fra: Jim White <jwhite43@xxxxxxx>
> Til: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Real Traders 99
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Emne: Re: Astro Technical Analysis - Double Standard?
> Dato: Thursday, July 08, 1999 6:57 AM
>
> This reveals the real objective of this individual - not to further the
> knowledge of the trader but to sell you something.
> And there is no double standard. Each and every technique should stand up
to
> the same level of scrutiny. I would like to see just one astro guy
respond
> to questions on his technique with an objective experiment that could be
> tested by anyone. I don't think we will see such an offer.
> Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Real Traders 99 <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 1999 11:46 PM
> Subject: Astro Technical Analysis - Double Standard?
>
>
> > RTs,
> >
> > . One observation that I have made is that it seem that the skeptics
> > set a higher standard for Astrology than they do for any other form of
> > market analysis. When someone mentions that they got a buy signal based
> > on some oscillator or moving average, you don't see the entire RT list
> > jump all over them asking for extensive statistics and causation
proving
> > that it works. If they do mention that it works 70% of the time, people
> > are crawling thru their computer monitors to try to get the formulae
for
> > the new found holly grail. Now, I am apparently expected to give
> > definitive scientific proof and causation for Astrology and the
markets.
> >
> > This is a double standard applied by the skeptics. It is does not set a
> > fair or level playing field.
> > My purpose in posting Astro correlations is only to whet peoples
> > appetites for this area of study. I am not here to do their research
or
> > homework. If they can see a nugget of value in researching something I
> > post, then I have done the list a valuable service. If someone decides
> > that they would like to seriously pursue this avenue of study, I stand
> > ready to help.
> >
> > Appetizingly,
> >
> > Norman
> >
|