|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>Theoretically we might say:
>1/. Charlie makes money trading.
>2/. Charlie tosses a coin and goes long when it is heads, and short when it
>is tails.
>
> Is it true then that: one CANNOT draw the conclusion that coin tossing is
>flawed as a way to trade profitably?
>And further, is it also true that one CANNOT argue that coin tossing is
>totally invalid, and at the same time accept that Charlie uses it to trade
>profitably?
>
>-----Messaggio originale-----
>Da: JCDuffy@xxxxxxx <JCDuffy@xxxxxxx>
>A: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Data: 07 July 1999 16:47
>Oggetto: Re: Trading Gen: The Duck - Astology
>
>
>>Fact #1: Norman makes money trading.
>>Fact #2 Norman uses astrology to trade.
>>
>>One might argue what conclusions may be be drawn from these facts.
>>
>> One conclusion that CANNOT be drawn though, is that astrolgy is flawed as
>a
>>way to trade profitably. As well, one CANNOT argue that astology is
totally
>>invalid, and at the same time accept Norman uses it to trade profitably.
>>
>
|