|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=880595601-30061999>Could
someone tell me how I can remove myself from this list?
Thanks!</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=880595601-30061999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=880595601-30061999>Whatever happened to the digest format
anyway?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=880595601-30061999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT face=Arial><SPAN
class=880595601-30061999>Jonatha<SPAN
class=880595601-30061999>n</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Jun 29 20:25:01 1999
Return-Path: <owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (ml.nw.verio.net [204.202.220.47])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA13472
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:12:17 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id SAA23838
for realtraders-sendemout; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id SAA23834
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.ap.net (mailhost.ap.net [205.134.237.20])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id SAA05241
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ap.net (D-23.Portal-02.ap.net [207.44.186.56])
by mailhost.ap.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA05767;
Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <377977D3.F0A2181A@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:12 -0700
From: Ira <ist@xxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Alexander <gta3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: JCDuffy@xxxxxxx, realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ira's trading method
References: <199906300143.VAA02521@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Status:
I've been married for a very long time and it still works, I traded well and
therefore I don't have to try and do anything else. Because you failed doesn't
mean that no one can be a success. Maybe you and Duffy can form a mutual
admiration society. Rather then learn you would rather ridicule. Ira
Tom Alexander wrote:
> Uh, maybe I'm missing something, but "retirement" and/or success in trading
> would not necessarily have a strong correlation. I've retired from several
> things from which I was not particularly successful: first marriage, 100
> yard dash , high jump , etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Alexander
>
> ----------
> From: Ira <ist@xxxxxx>
> To: JCDuffy@xxxxxxx
> Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Ira's trading method
> Date: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 8:37 PM
>
> WEll I have been retired since 1985, what are you doing? Ira
>
> JCDuffy@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 99-06-29 10:45:09 EDT, ist@xxxxxx writes:
> >
> > << I didn't say it was mechanical. The system produces a series of
> targets,
> > the
> > first of which has an 80% probability, and a 1/1 risk reward ratio. The
> > second
> > target is a 2/1 risk reward ratio and has a 70% probability, and the
> third
> > target
> > has a 3/1 risk reward ratio and has a 60% probability. If you have
> doubts, I
> > can
> > give you e mails to traders who will verify the fact.
> >
> > Ira. >>
> >
> > Sorry, any doubts just would have stemmed from the fact that I just
> didn't
> > figure the Shiek of Brunei would be named Ira. Any method with these
> numbers
> > could turn a $10K account in multi milliions within 6 months with a very
> low
> > probability of ruin.
|