|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Earl,
Your comments on DT software etc were very interesting!
I went to Bob Miners LA workshop last weekend, and while I agree with you on
the quality of his presentation and materials, I thought the software
"looked" quite elegant, and relatively friendly. It was version 3 though,
which he says will be out next month.
Have you seen v3? I wonder if it is significantly different from what you
have in v2 (I presume). I did not use it myself, but watched him set up and
manipulate dozens of charts during the course of the day with relative ease.
And my background is in systems & network consulting, i.e. computer hardware
& software. It seemed well done to me based on that 1 day experience, but I
would clearly defer to your daily experience!
I was also quite interested in your comments about poor multi monitor & NT
support. I use NT, and am soon to be using 2 displays. I just purchased an
Appian Jeronimo Pro 8MB 2 port card. What do you use?
Ironically, I have also spent some time working with Advanced GET. I bought
it after a seminar about 2-3 months ago. However, due to the fact that they
haven't came up with a fully compatible version for FutureSource (my feed)
TS 4.0, and NT, neither they nor I could get it to run without problems. So
I returned it. I even went through the michigaas (excuse my Yiddish
spelling) of contracting with eSignal, loaded SP2 of TS2000, and while I
got GET to work in THAT environment, TS2000's flaky behavior killed that
course of action.
Those issues aside, GET was perhaps the most elegant interface I have ever
used among dozens of Mac & PC apps over the years, and yet (unrelated) I
found it seemed to mislabel waves somewhat regularly when left on
"autopilot".
Now I am NO Elliott wave expert, but I do like Miners manual approach to
Elliott wave, and if I used Advanced GET without the EW autopilot, is that a
valid reason to "lease" GET? The EW elements are the core of the package are
they not?
What do you think?
Eliot
> Miner's DT methodology and workshop materials are very good and well worth
> the investment. I am not very happy with the DT software. While it includes
> some unique and handy tools, the user interface is not terribly friendly
> (more like DOS than Windows), the software does not work reliably under Win
> NT, and it is not friendly to my multi-monitor system. I'm not up on the
> latest version of AdvGet but I would give it a serious look before buying
> the DT software.
>
> Earl
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BL <mailto:blee3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Real Traders <mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 8:42 PM
> Subject: Software: Dynamic Trader
>
> Comments, pro or con, regarding "Dynamic Trader" software / methods ?? -
> Thanks, Brian
Eliot Kaplan
Voice:310.455.3950
Integrated Solutions Unlimited, Inc. Fax:310.455.3085
20211 Croydon Lane email:eliot@xxxxxxx
Topanga, CA 90290
www.isu.com
Apple, HP, IBM, & Compaq Reseller/Apple Authorized Service Provider
Specializing in Architecture & Graphics Systems
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|