|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1700"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=""><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3>andrew et
al..</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT face=Garamond></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=""><FONT face=Garamond><FONT
size=3></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Garamond></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3>i seem to hear many complaints over Bmi
and Signal on this and other lists.</FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Garamond></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Garamond></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3>yet i have heard few if any complaints
(that i can remember) regarding the quality of SPComstock data
feed.</FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT face=Garamond></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Garamond></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3>i am told by others who do use SPCom.,
that it exceeds their expectations. is there any one on this list using SP
Comstock with good (or bad) results ..? software ..
?</FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT face=Garamond></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Garamond><FONT size=3></FONT></FONT><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Garamond></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>-----------</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Andrew <<A
href="mailto:andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Monday, June 21, 1999 5:53 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Gen: BMI and customer
service or lack thier of. <BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I am sure some of you feel you have gotten
good service. I'm glad you are happy. For anyone else looking
for </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>a data vendor, cover your bases. Check out all the
vendors and talk to a lot of people. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I made a frustrating mistake. One which I hope you
can avoid. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Andrew.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jun 21 18:19:36 1999
Received: from ml.nw.verio.net (204.202.220.47)
by mail07.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP id 09867635;
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) id QAA29155
for realtraders-sendemout; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.nwnet.net (mail1.nwnet.net [192.220.251.8])
by ml.nw.verio.net (970819888) with ESMTP id QAA29147
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL01 (mail.toast.net [206.244.186.11])
by mail1.nwnet.net (970819888) with ESMTP id QAA08041
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dennisco - 216.214.196.62 by toast.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 19:29:13 -0400
Message-ID: <00a501bebc3d$ca32b3e0$3ec4d6d8@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Dennis Conn" <dlc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <droex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mervin Yeung" <tinyeung@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Real Traders" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OPTN: Market on Close
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 19:28:32 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: e340d0170d65d64e68e65160b9f759e1.2b
In futures, I'm not aware of a requirement to have an option order in at a
time significantly in advance of the close - is that something peculiar to
stocks?
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: THE DOCTOR <droex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Mervin Yeung <tinyeung@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Real Traders <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: OPTN: Market on Close
>Mervin,
>
>Using options to replace stops may in fact be an excellent idea. Using MOC
>order is the purest form of suicide I know. MOC allows the traders to
>close the series at any price they may need(within reason)and because the
>order has to come in well prior to the close they lean on your order. You
>in effect have given them a stop on their position and you are doing it in
>a volatile issue or you wouldn't be concerned about the stop in the first
>place. Use a limit order and make certain you know what your broker's
>cutoff times are.
>
>Mervin Yeung wrote:
>
>> Hi RTs,
>>
>> I am trying to use options to replace stops. I worry about the
>> liquidity. I know the close is usually the most liquid of the day. I
>> wonder if I use Market on Close Order to buy calls or puts right at the
>> close, is it a good way?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Mervin
>
|