|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Re[2]: Gen: TS4 & TS2K Lab Experiment..</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<BLOCKQUOTE><UL><LI>Sorry I didn't read your first post carefully enough, your CPU usage, may be an
<LI>issue. I have run them side by side but always had one off line. If your using
<LI>Signal-On-Line, is the signal software receiving data?<BR>
</UL><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>Yes it is!<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><UL><UL><LI>I have to run the GlobalServer overnight, and for part of a market day before ihas finished building its process codes, and starts collecting data, but I'm on DTN now.<BR>
</UL></UL><BR>
<BR>
Was that true for TS2000 GlobalServer when you were on eSignal? In either case, I had the GlobalServer on from yesterday noon and all last night, but still no go.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><UL><LI> I have run both Signal-On-Line with both the GlobalServer and Signal's
<LI>software running at the same time as they use TCP/IP, to access the Signal Data
<LI>Manager, so I could check the GlobalServer.<BR>
</UL></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
Yes I have Signal's Software running too, and its symbols are receiving data. AND, TS 4.0 is receiving data fine through FutureSource. AND (something I didn't mention before) I have Advanced GET receiving data perfectly off the eSignal online feed too. BUT, I can't get TS2000 to take in that same data that eSignal's front end software & GET are perfectly happy to receive!<BR>
<BR>
Strange eh?!<BR>
<BR>
Eliot<BR>
<BR>
Eliot Kaplan Voice:310.455.3950<BR>
Integrated Solutions Unlimited, Inc. Fax:310.455.3085<BR>
20211 Croydon Lane email:eliot@xxxxxxx<BR>
Topanga, CA 90290 www.isu.com<BR>
<BR>
Apple, HP, IBM, & Compaq Reseller/Apple Authorized Service Provider<BR>
Specializing in Architecture & Graphics Systems<BR>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon May 31 13:15:03 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP is 2147426188
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 15:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id MAA19138;
Mon, 31 May 1999 12:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from front3.grolier.fr (front3.grolier.fr [194.158.96.53])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id MAA18990
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 12:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (Annecy-2-146.club-internet.fr [195.36.130.146])
by front3.grolier.fr (8.9.3/No_Relay+No_Spam_MGC990224) with SMTP id VAA21061
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 21:33:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <000101beab9c$70a40d80$928224c3@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 21:24:52 +0200
Reply-To: tedco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "ted stampeen" <tedco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GEN> LOS SQUAWK/BOX
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01BEABAC.05A3D460"
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: eb6a7601e6078aa9cde919e43854823f.03
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#c0c0c0>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System size=4>TO ALL,</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System
size=4>
is anyone using it, and if so, do you actually find it makes you more
PROFITABLE,</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System size=4>or is it just another gadget to further
add to confusion???</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System size=4></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=System
size=4>
from SWISS- TED</FONT></STRONG></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon May 31 13:54:57 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail07.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.4) with SMTP is 2147426188
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 16:46:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id NAA20600;
Mon, 31 May 1999 13:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer.inrete.it (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [194.116.9.4])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id NAA20438
for <REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 13:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dial129.inrete.it (dial129.inrete.it [194.116.8.29])
by mailer.inrete.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA15706
for <REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 31 May 1999 22:39:52 +0200
Message-Id: <3753697B.20A6@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 22:02:51 -0700
Reply-To: atorchio@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Alberto Torchio <atorchio@xxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: OPTN: Re: Options vs Stops
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: Realtraders <REALTRADERS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 2840fa5e278471d00db323b8b96da897.01
RTs,
The posting that originated the thread specifically metnioned the currencies. Regarding
this specific market I think there are two further alternatives:
1. placing stop orders on GLOBEX
2. placing stop orders on the cash market.
I have mentioned these alternative solutions since I know they should theorically be
available: I have never used any of them so, if anyone knows better, please comment.
Alberto Torchio
Torino, Italy
|