|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ben,
One of my advisor friends has calculated a range of 1384 high to 1372 lo.
Another formula used in Joe Ross's book trading by the minute comes up
with 1380.5 High 1369 Lo for
a sideways congestion..
And for the Astrologically impaired.. Negative Geocentric energy forcefully
expressed until 9:57 am Eastern.
I expect a down opening...
Don
Proffittak@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 5/13/99 5:22:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> << hello
>
> i do not normally like to do this
> BUT
> tomorow there is a better then 97% probabiliy based on NONE liniar
> calculations
> that
>
> hi 1375
> lo 1359
> close 1370-1374
>
> lets see what happens
>
> p.s
> ovrall i do expect 2 more new hi close on the spoos(in 2-4 buss
> days)
> happy trading
> Ben
>
>
> ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
> Return-Path: <>
> Received: from rly-zd03.mx.aol.com (rly-zd03.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.227])
> by air-zd02.mail.aol.com (v59.4) with SMTP; Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:07 -0400
> Received: from imo24.mx.aol.com (imo24.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.68])
> by rly-zd03.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
> with ESMTP id RAA23277 for <Proffittak@xxxxxxx>;
> Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:06 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from localhost (localhost)
> by imo24.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
> with internal id RAA04980;
> Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
> Message-Id: <199905132122.RAA04980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
> boundary="RAA04980.926630527/imo24.mx.aol.com"
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
> >>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxx>
> To: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
>
> The original message was received at Thu, 13 May 1999 17:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
> from root@xxxxxxxxx
>
> *** ATTENTION ***
>
> An e-mail you sent to an Internet destination could not be delivered.
>
> The Internet address is listed in the section labeled:
> "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
>
> The reason your e-mail could not be delivered is listed in the section labeled:
> "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
>
> The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
> not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
> general translation for other e-mail servers.
>
> Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
> administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to list.listserver.com.:
> >>> RCPT To:<realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <<< 550 <realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
> 550 <realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
>
> --------------------
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> Remote-MTA: DNS; list.listserver.com
> Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
> Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
>
> --------------------
> Received: from Proffittak@xxxxxxx (4421)
> by imo24.mx.aol.com (IMOv20) id 3KSTa02624
> for <realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 May 1999 17:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
> Return-path: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
> From: Proffittak@xxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <34027a4b.246c9c36@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:20:54 EDT
> Subject: sp500 for fri RANGE
> To: realtrader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 214
>
> hello
>
> i do not normally like to do this
> BUT
> tomorow there is a better then 97% probabiliy based on NONE liniar
> calculations
> that
>
> hi 1375
> lo 1359
> close 1370-1374
>
> lets see what happens
>
> p.s
> ovrall i do expect 2 more new hi close on the spoos(in 2-4 buss
> days)
> happy trading
> Ben
|