|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree the survey was useless nonsense but the work of people like Norm Winsky
is useful. So if we want to throw the baby out with the bath water, let's ban
comments on systems since so many don't work. And while we're at it lets ban
fundamentals because some give bad advice. Of course, technicals will be
included in the ban because some people think they are hog wash. Let's see, I
think we can ban all ideas with which someone disagrees.
Timothy Wolfe wrote:
> This is utter nonsense...a lack of tolerance???? Oh puleeeeze !!!!!
> Then would it be ok to introduce VooDoo practices into a good "Shorting"
> methodology??
>
> > John,
> > Sounds like a very closed minded approach. If some people can make astro
> work for
> > trading, why not show a little tolerance. It is the lack of tolerance and
> > flexibility that is the root of many of our problems today and throughout
> history.
> >
> > John Napier wrote:
> >
> > > Several days ago the web master asked that all you
> > > astrologers converse with each other privately through your
> > > own email.
> > > THAT IS STILL AN EXCELLENT IDEA.
> > > I don't want to start a rumble here but why don't we get off
> > > this CRAP and get back to sharing good trading ideas and
> > > information that will
> > > improve our trading techniques. THAT'S WHAT THIS FORUM IS
> > > ABOUT. Not astrology or sun worshipping or occultic signs.
> > > Whoever started this thing why don't you give all those
> > > others who have joined in with their special signs YOUR
> > > private email or still better, why don't you start your own
> > > web page just for that stuff.
> > > I, Like you, don't want to offend anyone..BUT you have
> > > offended me. So lets call it quits right now while you are
> > > ahead.
> > >
> > > TTrue61470@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 5/12/99 7:46:59 AM Central Daylight Time,
> chmeyer@xxxxxxxx
> > > > writes:
> > > >
> > > > << I'm no rocket scientist, especially as it relates to quant skills--
> > > > but isn't it silly to consider this a valid sample base; and size? >>
> > > >
> > > > I totally agree. At the risk of getting the administration mad at me
> I'd like
> > > > to point out a few things about astrology.
> >
> >
|