|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#c0c0c0>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I was wondering if anyone else has problems with
the NEWS SERVER?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>IM </FONT>using SIGNAL data
feed , and get FWN, but I have up to 10-20min gaps between
headlines,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>also my keyword filter doesn't and never did
work, its not on signals end, the OMEGA people dont
know, even had the head cheese on the phone, still no go, so they gave me
an upgrade to TS from SC FOR 400$$, ANY SUGGESTIONS, besides the
garbage</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
size=2>
advance thanks, GOOD TRADING</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed May 12 08:03:57 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 4087
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 09:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id GAA05167;
Wed, 12 May 1999 06:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.cei.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [204.117.117.29])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id GAA04884
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 06:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from World (max4134.cei.net [204.180.118.134])
by smtp1.cei.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA13628
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 08:17:24 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990512081908.006cf1ec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 08:19:10 -0500
Reply-To: staylor@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Stewart Taylor <staylor@xxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Another Simple Setup
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====================_926533150==_"
X-Sender: staylor@xxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: f0b12c39d9f5cf0f355cd12d49f7b2ed.0f
I was cleaning out workspaces and came across this recent example of the
same setup that I showed on an intraday basis. This is the US9M. This
formation produced a nice trade (a little over 1 1/2 points, but as you can
see, despite the great potential the trade died an untimely death.
Here are some of the things I look for....
1) The obvious break of a downtrend. Hopefully the trend will display some
sort of ending action... either a big bump in volume or a spikey V type
bottom. In this illustration the downtrend is broken at point 1. The break
of the downtrend is the first alert that a trade may be setting up.
2) A rally or first reaction. Note that the rally took almost two weeks to
develop.
3) Price sets back. Note how this decline differs from the initial
decline. Volume (not shown) is appreciably lower that on the initial
decline, daily price spreads are narrower, and the angle of the decline is
significantly less steep than the initial decline. All of these are
consistent with LESS SUPPLY.
4) I generally like to see retests go back to or very close to the pivot
being tested. But when a decline is this orderly and sets up so well in
terms of a trigger... I will usually make an exception. In this case note
how well the trigger line fits in along the highs of the retest.
5) At point 3 the market thrusts (proves its ability to rally) and triggers
you in. The most difficult part in this trade is deciding upon the
appropriate initial stop.
6) Choices for initial stop 1) Below the initial 119.09 low. 2) Below the
low of the retest @ 119.22. 3) Below the low of the wide price spread bar
that broke out (@119.29). 4) Just below the mid point of the wide range bar.
In this case, the distance to the larger stops was over a point and while I
felt like the trade had a great deal of potential I didn't want to sit
through a point drawdown. Additionally, had the market suffered a serious
setback the pattern would have been negated. Keep in mind, I liked this
trade a lot. The setup was a very solid one. Ultimately I set my initial
stop just under the low of the wide range bar and resolved to move it
higher in an aggressive manner.
Keep in mind... I view it as failure if one of my stops is hit before I get
out of the trade. In other words, I pride myself on knowing before a stop
level is reached that a trade is going wrong and closing it out,
particularly if the stop is a great distance away. If the market hadn't
begun carrying through higher within a two to three periods or traded
significantly back below the broken trigger, I would have gone ahead and
closed it out. I suspect that my ultimate loss would have been 3/4 of a
point or so.
Anyway, after one day of consolidation, the market began to move to the
high and the stop was moved up behind the price action.
This is all of the time I have today. Hope this is instructional.
Stewart.
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\US9MSimple.gif"
Stewart Taylor
Taylor Fixed Income Outlook
Voice: 501-219-9774
Fax: 501-228-0963
E-Mail: staylor@xxxxxxx
Web Site: http://www.cei.net/~staylor/From ???@??? Wed May 12 08:04:09 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 11835
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 10:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id HAA07334;
Wed, 12 May 1999 07:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id HAA07217
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 12 May 1999 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from robert ([63.10.52.179]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP
id <19990512140520.FDJ5917@xxxxxx>;
Wed, 12 May 1999 14:05:20 +0000
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990512090518.007c4aa0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 09:05:18 -0500
Reply-To: robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Robert Cummings <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GEN: Realtraders
In-Reply-To: <199905121357.IAA22649@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <19990511195229.22388.rocketmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: gpeder@xxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 79c2592bc9a291ad447f20c44c0bce0f.14
That's hilarious I can't get off. Tried everything what's the secret to
unsubcribe to this list.
Robert
At 08:45 AM 5/12/1999 -0600, Glenn Pederson wrote:
>On 11 May 99, at 12:52, Johnny Storm wrote:
>
>> Hi I have a friend that want's to join Realtraders, however everytime he
>> tries to goto www.realtraders.com it says the server is not available.
>
>I too, have had this same problem for about a week now.
>
>Glenn Pederson
>gpeder@xxxxxxxxx
>
|