PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Good Evening RTer's:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Back five years ago they had programs for over $2000.(for
Jerry's information) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Never went to court, settled for a significantly lesser amount
out of court. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Cut and Run</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Richard Chehovin</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue May 04 17:24:11 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail07.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 4652969
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 May 1999 19:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id QAA08194;
Tue, 4 May 1999 16:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fh101.infi.net (fh101.infi.net [208.131.160.100])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id QAA07881
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 May 1999 16:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from naples.infi.net (pm2-75.apf.infi.net [208.143.133.75])
by fh101.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA08590;
Tue, 4 May 1999 19:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <372FAFE0.9759F4C1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 19:41:37 -0700
Reply-To: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Gen: Fidelity's Commissions - FOLLOW-UP
References: <3.0.5.32.19990504131444.00bf9100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: boggio@xxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
scheer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win16; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: ae03683246a40bd83e6cd1ad132db313.06
Status: U
G.John Boggio wrote:
> RTer's and FTer's,
>
> Just thought I would give you a follow-up on my conversation with a Fidelity Spartan Brokerage...... Supervisor regarding a possible wavier of their new commission policy (see below for more details). To make a long story short, I had an amicable conversation in which I informed him that I would like to have their new policy waved. This was based on the fact that YTD I have generated over $17,000 in 'on-line' commission and over $60,000 since 1997. He indicated that he saw my frequency of trading and appreciated my business BUT said that he could not do anything to help.
>
> I indicated that this change will require me to look elsewhere for brokerage and mutual fund services and thus would be closing out some rather large accounts. I also indicated that I have been in contact with several of you (from these two forums) who have also expressed disappointment with their new policy. Without trying to speak for others, I said that the impression that I got from those conversations was that they too would be looking to close their accounts with Fidelity. He said, "well, we appreciate your business but if that is what you need to do....". The conversation ended shortly thereafter and now I am getting back to you.
>
> So, it looks like I will begin my search for a new brokerage company.
>
> Out out curiosity, does anyone know if there is a company that offers on-line trading via their own software RATHER than using the web. This would be similar to Fidelity's Fox+ software vs their Webexpress. I know a lot of you did not like their Fox+ program but, in my opinion, it was a hell of a lot better than their slow and cumbersome Webexpress. I guess I will be checking with all the big boys: Vanguard, Scudder, DLJ, Datek, Brown, and Schwab etc. Any suggestion?
>
> Thanks,
> John Boggio
>
> At 06:13 PM 5/3/99 -0400, G.John Boggio wrote:
> >Rter's and Fter's,
> >
> > Is anyone aware of Fidelity's new STOCK commission schedule in which they
> >are now charging for every lot bot or sold even if you are below the 1000
> >share limit. Apparently, this new rule went into effect on 4/27/99. It no
> >longer allows for multiply trades on the same side, on the same day.
> >Example, if you bot 500 shares of DELL at 41.50 and then bot another 500 at
> >41.00 an hour later, you will now be charged 2 commission fees. This even
> >applies to "active" on-line traders...which I am. Normally, such a trade
> >would run me a total of $14.95 for the day for the 1000 shares.
> >
> > Anyhow, when I spoke with Fidelity today about a trade I placed the other
> >day, I was informed of this new rule. I have now asked for a supervisor to
> >contact me regarding a wavier of this newly proposed fee, based on the fact
> >that I have already generated commissions of nearly $17,000 ytd and over
> >$26,000 last year. Am I alone in this fight or are others in the same boat?
> >
> > Finally, the Fid. representative also told me that they sent a notice of
> >this new rule to their commission schedule several months ago. Well, I
> >never saw a thing, did you? Also, if you go to their website and check out
> >their commission schedule, it does not say anything either.
> >
> >
> >http://personal351.fidelity.com/accounts/services/content/socommissions.html
> >.tvsr
> >
> >Any info would be greatly appreciated,
> >John Boggio
> >
John et al,
How would you like to have Nasdaq Level II and all the state of the art electronic execution services giving you fills in 2 to 5 seconds? Commisions are approximately $20 per ticket. You can have
this point, click,, and get filled service on your PC for only $300 plus phone line charges. Once you see this system you will never want to trade any aother way again. If interested, e-mail scheer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx or call Adam or Michael Scheer, Landmark Securities, 941-430-9182.
Be sure to tell em Winski sent ya, as they carefully screen their clients. They have a $50K minimum account size. Let me know how it goes.
Regards,
Norman
|