[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OEX and VIX: Un-Fair Value



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1700"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>&gt;Come on Gitanshu, tell us your secret for finding fair value using 
options.&nbsp;&nbsp; <BR>&gt;You know, the one you call Implied Fair 
Value.&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>What can I say Bob - 40 OEX points in a day Implies Fair Value for a hard 
day's work :) </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">&gt;</FONT>and created this one 
showing our trades today.&nbsp; <BR>&gt;Sorry, code is locked in a bank 
vault.<BR></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Ah well - another one of those black screen boxes. Hate those black 
boxes.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Old timers on the list would celebrate the Return Of Bob The Jedi to the 
vocal e-world. I can assure you he isn't always like this, so milk his brain 
while Bob the Groundhog sniffs spring air at RT. He gets excited by the process 
of discovery of a new indicator he can put to use (called Indicatoritis), or by 
the process of poetry in motion on a price chart as you have seen the 
before-after cases yesterday and today from his cone charts (real trades, real 
money).</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Maybe The Doctor can help us here. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I use VIX to &quot;understand&quot; what the market is implying the ATM 
volatilities are on a minute by minute basis. Since VIX is only reported at one 
minute intervals, it presumably has some inherent weaknesses:</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>- Say OEX moves through 2 strike sets within 1 minute, thereby causing a 
sudden dis-continuous hump in VIX as old strikes rotate out in favor of new 
ones. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Is there any way this time lag gets rectified in the VIX computational 
algorithm? For example, OEX 680 Calls and puts moved around much more in the 
bid-ask spread than normal around the time Bob indicates purchase - and yet the 
price move in the options was not as violent within that same timeframe. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>VIX gets computed basis last trade, not basis the varying bid/ask. 
Correct?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>- Since bid-asks on days like today are half or more point apart, how does 
VIX compensate?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>- What happens to VIX's calculation if 2 or 3 of the 8 options used to 
index implied vols do not trade within that 1 minute between last reported vix 
and newly reported vix?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>On OEX, homework done over the weekend showed that </DIV>
<DIV>- today was a multiplicity of signals going off as of Friday close:</DIV>
<DIV>- We had an Inside Day </DIV>
<DIV>- which was also the Narrowest Range Day of the past 4 AND 7 trading 
sessions</DIV>
<DIV>- which did nothing to alter the downtrend begun on the slower MA used in 
ANTI</DIV>
<DIV>- and brought out the breakout traders who entered long on a break of 
Friday's high within the first 6 bars of trading</DIV>
<DIV>- helped along by Momentum Index Buyers on the strength of 2 bullish 
Connors Vix Reversals</DIV>
<DIV>- conservative ones exited into strength at the 2 std deviation cone 
reading - since from that point on the momentum - statistically - could only 
carry the market sideways into the close tracking the cone, or reverse - either 
way the money on the table would be idled and therefore exposed to risk of time 
decay, and of uncontrollable variables</DIV>
<DIV>- aggressive traders therefore reversed long positions and/or patient 
stalkers entered short, fading the morning pop (as Bob has illustrated using 
OEYQPs) knowing that momentum had reached its statistical peak for the day</DIV>
<DIV>- trailed stops and booked profits at test of morning lows (too fast, did 
not work) OR Friday lows (did work)</DIV>
<DIV>- market bounced but found resistance at Friday lows - and 1 sigma cone - 
so they re-entered short positions</DIV>
<DIV>- booked partial profits this time at the -2 std deviation cone</DIV>
<DIV>- but never got stopped out since Friday highs were never tested </DIV>
<DIV>- and at the close, they had the choice of booking profits on the remaining 
positions and starting Tuesday seasonality with a clean slate</DIV>
<DIV>- or carry their puts or put spreads home in the hope of some early morning 
follow-through where they could squeeze out money for a few hamburgers/pizzas 
from their positions</DIV>
<DIV>- or prepare a defense for their carry-home positions by pricing some call 
spreads while the world was giving them away.</DIV>
<DIV>- Or leave everything alone and just concentrate on figuring out WHY crude 
keeps rallying but the products (HU and HO) can't keep pace.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>At least that is what my trading diary wrote at 3:30 PM. Chart 
attached.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>As to vaults and volatile implications for Tuesday, you never know, my 
friend, you never know. The market is the sum total of some of the sharpest 
minds and the richest wallets in the world. All we can do is prepare for the 
next move, hoping it will be what we think it should be, but just in case it 
isn't, it ain't &quot;Game Over&quot;...</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>And so we get on with the homework for Terrible Tuesday - like figuring out 
where the parabolic moves we see on the charts to follow on the next email lead 
to conclusion... at the 50 day MAs or the 100 day MAs or at a 100% 
retracement...</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Gitanshu</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\snap247.gif"