|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I learned about Gann from a booklet I received as a bonus to my subscription
to Past Present Futures put out by James Flanagan. On page 22 of the book
HOW TO PROFIT FROM MAJOR MOVES IN FUTURES he shows a chart where the daily
S&P's Retraced 30 points three times to a top in 1987 just before the crash.
My next exposure to MEASURED MOVES came when I ordered George Angell's
EXCELLENT course Market symmetry for 99.00 it really opened my eyes to how
the S&P's on some day have perfect symmetry. My most recent exposure to
market symmetry is even higher than Gann's with MR. William Erman's,
Ermanometry.Check out the recent article in Technical Analysis of Stocks and
Commodities. His web site is www.ermanometry.com Hope this helps and Happy
trading.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Singerman <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxx <tesla@xxxxxxx>; realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 5:22 PM
Subject: Gann Methods
>Terry,
>
>It sounds like you are well versed in Gann. Could you recommend any books
>about Gann's methods?
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Terry S. Smith <tesla@xxxxxxx>
>To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 5:02 PM
>Subject: Re: Bill-ie's At It Again!
>
>
>> Good Idea. Let's talk about the S&P's and stop exchanging worthless gifts
>> (insults). Anyone else notice today how the S&P decline of 16.50 points
>> retraces to the 62% level and then declines another 16.50 for a temporary
>> bottom before making a third decline in the range of 16.50 points? W.D.
>Gann
>> calls this a measured move. It also works on the daily chart. The rally
in
>> the daily June S&P's goes from 1229 on March 3rd to 1337 on March 19th
for
>a
>> move of 108 points. Where will the next high be? Add 108 points to the
>next
>> low on march 23rd of 1267 and what do you know the projected high is
1375,
>2
>> points off Monday's high of 1373. Happy trading.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 12:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: Bill-ie's At It Again!
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >OkieDame@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> >
>> >> My thoughts exactly, Linda.....little girls aren't really noted for
>turf
>> >> battles; this is a little BOYS sport. I think we should rename this
>> forum
>> >> "Systems' Analysis"; very little stock or commodity market information
>is
>> >> discussed and this handful of the self-appointed elite rarely find
>> anything
>> >> or anyone else acceptable.
>> >
>> >Okie,
>> > I agree wholeheartedly. You expessed what was gnawing at me about
>these
>> >posts but I couldn't seem to find the right words. By the way, my system
>is
>> >bigger and better than yours! <G>
>> > These endless discussions of whose system is better is like a bunch of
>> >carpeters sitting around arguing whose tools are bigger and better, yet
>> they
>> >never design or build anything.
>> >
>> > Anyone have any opinions or analysis on the markets? Wow, now
>there's
>> a
>> >radical idea! If this is too foreign or new for some of you, here is a
>> >hypothetical example: "I think Palm Oil futures look like a low risk buy
>> now,
>> >as they approach their 62% retracement at the xxxx.xx support area based
>on
>> the
>> >previous bull run of the past 21 years. Additionally, 21 years is 1/4
of
>> the
>> >84 years Uranus cycle, and I have found Uranus to be closely tied to the
>> price
>> >movements of Palm Oil. Given this scenario, I would expect Palm Oil
>futures
>> to
>> >rally to yyyy.yy, generating a potential profit of $zzzz.zz. One can
>use
>> a
>> >small $qqq stop loss on the contingency that the major support is
broken.
>> This
>> >gives us a very favorable risk reward profile of 10 to 1. Don't let
>this
>> one
>> >slip away. Charts are available at www.notmywebsite.com.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> > /\/
>> >\/\/
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In a message dated 4/14/99 12:12:21 PM Central Daylight Time,
>> >> lswope@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>> >>
>> >> << Maybe we should call this the Bill and Bob show....they are like
two
>> >> >> little GIRLS....both of them are full of you know what!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hey, I resent that "little girls" remark. It's you boys and your
>> >> testosterone that are full of you know what!
>> >>
>> >> Linda
>> >> Swope's Mountain Photography >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
|