|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Can you please explain the difference between the Serbs and the Kosovar
Albanians and the attacks of the Turks against the Kurds in Kurdistan and
the different attitude of the USA against the Turkish and the Serbian war
criminals.
In both cases this is an internal problem of a souvereign contry
(Jugoslavia and Turkey) - why did NATO bomb the Serbs for killing of the
Albanians but did not bomb the Turks for bombing, raiding and using poison
gas and mass destruction weapons agains the Kurds. IMHO the crime is the
same - in Kurdistan even worse than in Kosovo.
Europe is not Iraq - the first prove is the downing of the Stealth F-117
bomber by the Serbs- and when more coffins will start comming home to the
States we will end up with an new Vietnam this time in Europe.
If someone decide to answer this difficult question, pls avoid the fake
arguments of President Clinton for human right violence, democracy,
freedomfighters, etc - after the Monica affair this sounds so untrustwothy
- a person lying to his family and country has no right to address the
international society and kill innocent people in Europe - he should first
of all clean up his mind from all Monicas, Paulas etc and resign the
office. This way he'll to a great favour to his American caountrymen.
Isn't it a funny argument - you are bombing the Serbs because you don't
like their President - by the way ellected in an ellection, accepted by the
whole international society inc. the USA & all the other NATO members. Pls
remember there was no one objection to the ellections in Serbia
(Yugoslavia) but now you're bombing them. Why not bombing the United
Kingdom for themurders of the British Army in Northern Ireland or bombing
the Turks for their actions in Kurdistan. Pls check the CNN reporting from
Friday - similar arguments were said by the Greek Foreign Minister Mr
Papandreu in front of the whole CNN audience, but cut short by the
anchorman of the broadcasting company.
I do understand that this is off topic from the realtraders main purpose,
but since somebody else started this topic and in the past there were some
funny discussions regarding such items as Bill Clintons impeachment, Iraq
etc., it may be usefull to exchange some thoughts re the "NEW WORLD ORDER"
underway now.
reagrds
At 14:27 28/3/99 +1000, you wrote:
>Robert,,,,
>
>Why is it that when America has a world series event, The USA is the only
>competitor?
>Kinda reminds me of NATO,,, Yes it is made up of lots of nations ...everyone
>does what they are told by the "US forces"
>The Gulf war was a classic, nothing to do with liberating people and all
to do
>with proctecting "oil" as the t-shirt said what if "Kuwait grew broccoli?"
>
>I do not remember "God" giving "Americans" the sole use or morality or
>judgement.
>since when has the US Miltiary being the conscience/consciousness of the
>world.
>
>How would you like it if we came and bombed the crap out of your cities
>because as a nation you "ethnically cleansed" the Native Indians and the
>Afro-Americans?
>
>Still I have the utmost respect for the ordinary American as I do for the
>ordinary and humble around the world, but lets keep some perspecive!
>Stephen
>"simpleman not superman"
>"if everyone cleaned up there own doorstep the world would be a wonderful
>place"!!!!!
>
>
>Robert W Cummings wrote:
>
>> SJ,
>> We all have a responsibility to stop so called ethic cleansing or any
>> Genocide not only as Americans but as a civilization. The killing of
>> innocent woman and children is horrible and has to stop. Besides its not
>> the US its NATO.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> SJ wrote:
>> >Sad,, it is but what about the people on the ground the USA have no right
>> >interfering in a sovereign nation!!
>>
>
>
>
|