|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>If you think about it, the A-B is a
measure of the last thrust while B-C is a measure of the last retracement. If
you look at stochastics, rsi and most other indicators, this is what they try to
measure, however the results are filtered rather than pure. A long way of saying
that working with thrust and retracement in pure form will give you the feel of
the market - I subscribe to DiNapoli's approach.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Earl</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Linda Swope <<A
href="mailto:lswope@xxxxxxxxxxx";>lswope@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Tuesday, March 16, 1999 2:42 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Fibonnaci price
projections?<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>I could use some help from those of you using
Fibonnaci ratios to set price projections. I have found 2 different
formulas from Joe DiNapoli and Robert Fischer. They calculate the
projections quite differently.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>If a stock moves in price from point A to point B,
and then retraces back to point C, DiNaploi figures you take (B-A), the
length of the original move, and multiply it by .618 or 1 or 1.618 and add
the results to C.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Fischer figures you take the length of the retracement, multiply it and
add it to C.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>One uses the length of the original move and the other uses the length
of the retracement as the basis. I've seen other formulas as
well. All give such different results. Any thoughts from
anyone?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks!</DIV>
<DIV>Linda</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000><BR>Swope's Mountain Photography<BR><A
href="mailto:linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Climb the
mountains & get their glad tidings: Peace will flow into you as sunshine
into flower; the winds will blow their freshness into you & storms their
energy, & cares will drop off you like autumn leaves. John Muir 1838 -
1914</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Mar 16 13:05:20 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 11131
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:52:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id MAA19261;
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neuman.interaccess.com (neuman.interaccess.com [207.70.126.130])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id MAA19109
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oemcomputer (d108.canal.interaccess.com [204.149.97.108])
by neuman.interaccess.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA08070
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:43:48 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <009501be6ffe$92e7e580$6c6195cc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:44:35 -0800
Reply-To: capstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter M. Beckwith" <capstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LBR and Trading Consistency
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0092_01BE6FBB.8269ECA0"
X-To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: ca55c6b736de566a78c24cea0b1c1fce.01
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I have also read that LBR has achieved nearly
70% winners in her trading. I have absolutely no reason to doubt that this
is true. In many of her articles and other related items she mentions that
many of the best S&P daytraders trade only one aspect of the market and only
during one specific time of day. I would like to think that this is
another reason why many professional traders do so well. As Chris
mentioned, yesterday morning was an optimum time to enter the S&P's(there
was a trend), today was not. The professional trader would have probably
built a significant position during yesterday's trading while today he may have
been chopped up on smaller size. The amateur trader is always looking for
action, always looking to trade taking very small profits and equally if not
greater losses. Most of the time he does not increase his position size
during a trend and does not decrease his position size during sideways
action. I have come to understand this myself and I have tried to pass
this information along to others who are unsuccessful as S&P
daytraders. Money management, trend identification, and a good emotional
framework are the only ingredients to successful S&P trading and yet it is
still so difficult...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Peter Beckwith</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Mar 16 19:34:02 1999
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 17340
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 22:32:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id TAA09614;
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from send205.yahoomail.com (web301.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.183])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id TAA09503
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [24.94.22.15] by web301.yahoomail.com; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:26:03 PST
Message-Id: <19990317032603.27311.rocketmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: dickwebb711@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Dick Webb <dickwebb711@xxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ????? simulated real time trading
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 6255fcfe5880fd60b6b6814ea55cf961.03
Does anyone know of a firm or a broker that offers internet based free
real time simulated trading?
A place to check out a system real time and get a feel for it.
Thanks
Dick
==
Big Lucky Dick
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|