[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: Revised Letter.



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



-----Original Message-----
From:	G.C
Sent:	February 16, 1999 8:38 AM
To:	spider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Stock(s) Second opinion

Dear List Members:

I have a problem that requires a second opinion.  I have gone over this 
with a friend of mine who is an ex-floor trader (stocks) and suggested that 
I take this matter to mediation/arbitration. He has also encouraged me to 
ask the group and my peers for help and guidance. If any members of Real 
Traders group has an opinion or comment please E-mail directly. Your help 
would be greatly appreciated.
On Jan 22, 1999 @ 9:33 ET I placed an order through an online broker to buy 
600 shares of AMZN @ 99 1/4 limit, gtc.  to cover a short position.
I 'am watching the stock trade on my computer since I get real time quotes 
and running Tradestation ( so I "know" more or less where I am with my 
order.) Amazon trades below my price, I see prices touch as low as 99 on my 
chart after my order is in, so I assume I 'm filled.
To my gut wrenching surprise I eventually discover that I'm not filled. 
 Furthermore all my efforts to get to the bottom of this with my broker 
have been futile.  They claimed that "AMZN is a fast market stock therefore 
they don't owe me a fill".
I pursued this further and obtained time and sales from NASDAQ which 
clearly shows that there were numerous trades that took place below my bid 
many minutes after I entered my order.
This leads me to draw two possible scenarios. 1) Either my online broker 
lost my order which never made it to the nasdaq market-maker system or 2) 
the nasdaq market makers traded right through my price even though I had 
the best bid up for many minutes and never posted my bid on their board.
I am appealing to you all for your input on this.  This problem 
unfortunately involves a major part of my portfolio.
Thank you.

 GC


Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\WINMAIL20.DAT"