|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
It depends on the application. Windows NT itself uses more resources
than Windows 98 itself. But the system performance analysis tools for NT
are a boatload better than for 98. In theory, though, if you have two
identical machines with a lot of memory using the identical FAT-16 file
system and you're running the same application on both, the performance
of the systems with the only difference being 98 vs. NT should be the
same. NTFS, available only on NT, is much more efficient than FAT-16; I
don't know about FAT-32.
--
M. Edward Borasky znmeb@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.teleport.com/~znmeb
If God had meant carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits
fire.
-----Original Message-----
From: David <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: znmeb@xxxxxxxxxxxx <znmeb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 03:21
Subject: Re: CL_Signal OnLine & TimberHill down
>
>
>M. Edward Borasky wrote:
>
>> What I do for a living is computer performance analysis. Along with
the
>> art and the obvious required skills in interpreting data, there is a
>> great deal of mathematics and statistics involved.
>
>I have heard that when using Windows NT, the general performance of
your
>computer applications
>is faster that just using Windows 98.
>
>Do you know this to be true?
>
>Thank you.
>
>David
>
|