[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GEN: Why P&F Box Sizes?


  • To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: GEN: Why P&F Box Sizes?
  • From: Bob Fulks <bfulks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 20:59:11 -0500 (EST)
  • In-reply-to: <003e01be5302$9d6a9340$db051ad8@xxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

At 5:30 PM -0800 2/7/99, M. Edward Borasky wrote:

>Define a bad tick. Is it a price where a trade never happened? Or did
>someone actually exchange the tradeable at that price??


It could be a glitch in transmission, a keying error by a person recording
what he hears on the floor, a stock trade delayed 20 minutes by a slow
brokerage firm or any of hundreds of other sources. The bottom line - what
comes over your real-time data feed has errors.

Any indicator that uses Highs or Lows of a bar is subject to such errors as
it only takes one bad tick to set the high and low of a bar. Opens and
closes of a bar are much more reliable since the probability of a bad tick
occurring on the open or close is much lower.

And as they say, "Garbage in, garbage out".

Bob Fulks