[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "day-trading is dangerous"



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Amen, amen, amen...

And ESPECIALLY "Amen" to the government staying the hell out of the private
sector!

We're doing very well on our own, thank you!
-----Original Message-----
From: Money, James L <James_Money@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Mark Jurik' <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Realtraders'
<realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Omega List' <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 15:52
Subject: RE: "day-trading is dangerous"


>Day Trading is NOT dangerous!  It is completely necessary to provide
>adequate liquidity to longer term players.  The "danger" that is being
>referred to is simply that a "novice" trader could potentially bankrupt
>himself(and others).  This is a risk that all traders bear.  The Gov't
>shouldn't be stepping in to protect us from ourselves.
>
>Jim
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Jurik [SMTP:mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 1:34 PM
>> To: 'Realtraders'; 'Omega List'
>> Subject: SEC: "day-trading is dangerous"
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, alarmed by the increasing popularity of day
>> trading, has warned investors that rapid-fire online buying and selling
>> can be dangerous.
>>
>> In the Feb 4 edition of Business Briefs, Profnet (the service) would like
>> opinions on the pros and cons of online day trading.  I was asked to
>> provide the collected wisdom from traders on internet forums.
>>
>> So the question is simple:  Is the chariman correct in saying that it's
>> dangerous (as opposed to being mere risky) or is his point of view from
>> the "Old World", like a horse and buggy owner giving his opinion of the
>> "danger" of automobiles?
>>
>> - Mark Jurik
>>
>>
>>
>