[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ADRs



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE></STYLE>

<META content='"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I appreciate your help :</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>I saw ADRs mexican &gt;&gt;american depositaries ( mexican shares traded in 
us exchanges )</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>is there a symbol for every regional ADRs ?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>if yes , where can I find the different regional symbol for those ADRs ( 
american deposit regionals...? </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>thank you for your answer.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Feb 02 12:33:06 1999
Received: from mx1.eskimo.com (204.122.16.48)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 3741
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue,  2 Feb 1999 15:26:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from smartlst@xxxxxxxxx)
	by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id MAA07022;
	Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:25:10 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:25:09 -0800
Message-Id: <D1EDAC9D0A6ED211B5350008C7A40EAF1545FD@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Money, James L" <James_Money@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Mark Jurik'" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
        "'Realtraders'"
	 <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
        "'Omega List'" <Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: "day-trading is dangerous" 
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 14:10:03 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain
Resent-Message-ID: <"6ZJII1.0.Sj1.byrjs"@mx1>
Resent-From: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/30719
X-Loop: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: f28c94840565b50edd531920de3983f3.01

Day Trading is NOT dangerous!  It is completely necessary to provide
adequate liquidity to longer term players.  The "danger" that is being
referred to is simply that a "novice" trader could potentially bankrupt
himself(and others).  This is a risk that all traders bear.  The Gov't
shouldn't be stepping in to protect us from ourselves.

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Jurik [SMTP:mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 02, 1999 1:34 PM
> To:	'Realtraders'; 'Omega List'
> Subject:	SEC: "day-trading is dangerous" 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, alarmed by the increasing popularity of day
> trading, has warned investors that rapid-fire online buying and selling
> can be dangerous.  
> 
> In the Feb 4 edition of Business Briefs, Profnet (the service) would like
> opinions on the pros and cons of online day trading.  I was asked to
> provide the collected wisdom from traders on internet forums.
> 
> So the question is simple:  Is the chariman correct in saying that it's
> dangerous (as opposed to being mere risky) or is his point of view from
> the "Old World", like a horse and buggy owner giving his opinion of the
> "danger" of automobiles?
> 
> - Mark Jurik
> 
> 
> 






  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ADRs
      • From: U.Stuart Auslander, NYC