|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Man, you people are weird! This is a 16 year old child! And he has ruffled
yall's EGO because he made MONEY with only $ 3000. and you don't know how he
did it! So you want to know how he did it! Please!!!!!!!! Get a TRADING LIFE
OF YOUR OWN!!!!!!!!!!! and then give out your trading strategies for free!
Yea! Post them right HERE!! ALONG WITH ALL OF YOUR MONTHLY STATEMENTS!!! So
we can examine and tell if you are lying or not. Do you see how out of hand
this is getting. Get a Trading Life of your own and just congrat the young
man or try another subject. But enough already!
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Tillemans <dlt7@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 1999 6:16 PM
Subject: STKS: Verify 700% Return?
>Jawad, and RealTraders,
>
>I have followed this thread cautiously. I do not post to the list often,
>however, I am an advocate for treating people fairly who post on this list,
>as well as an advocate for respecting the integrity of the people who read
>the posts. Obviously it is difficult to conclude by e-mail postings
>whether Jawad's story is for real. ( Jawad, that is a very respectable
>return. However, it is easy to go back over the last month and pick trades
>that would have generated such a return after the fact.) Before we tar and
>feather a 16 year old, scar him for life, and run him off the list, may I
>suggest that Jawad fax copies of his account statements, along with a photo
>id, to a neutral member on the list for verification, or to one of the
>skeptics? If Jawad really is sincere about sharing his personal trading
>experience with the list and is willing to provide account statements, this
>level of validation might help to create a more constructive dialogue. If
>the returns do prove to be accurate, I would think that both Jawad as well
>as other members of the list would benefit from further discussions.
>
>I know nothing about Jawad and have no personal interest in this situation
>other than what is stated above. Of course, I am curious...
>
>Dan Tillemans
>
>
|