[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

TradeStation Question



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>I have had TradeStation for 
over 3 years, but I have a really dumb question.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>I have a chart formation 
coded for TradeStation that I would like to see &quot;Scan&quot;&nbsp; all the 
S&amp;P stocks.&nbsp; Do H haft to input every stock or can I do it in a bulk 
transfer ???</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Comic Sans MS" size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Comic Sans MS" size=2>Any help would be 
great</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Comic Sans MS" 
size=2>Rob</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Dec 06 15:41:36 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 21803
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun,  6 Dec 1998 17:33:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id OAA19704;
	Sun, 6 Dec 1998 14:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fh102.infi.net (fh102.infi.net [208.131.160.101])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id OAA19480
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 14:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from naples.infi.net (pm1-27.apf.infi.net [208.143.133.27])
	by fh102.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA16383;
	Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:26:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <366B3049.AE6EC8B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 17:32:58 -0800
Reply-To: nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: nwinski <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: foundation for the study of cycles
References: <006101be2143$acc3ef80$5b0f56d1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CD32E77FFB81B8C783B62986"
X-To: sp500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win16; U)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: ca5257a3c5f1fd1322c7544978496a6b

<x-html><HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
&nbsp;

<P>Rob wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Does
any have a phone number or web address for "The foundation for the study
of cycles"</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Does
anyone have any back issues??</FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Any
help would be great</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Rob</FONT></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
&nbsp; Rob,
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Tragically, after 57 years of pioneering cycles
research, FSC was recently taken over by a private interest. I was recently
told that the new tel. no. is 609-987-1401. A good source for cycles info
is
<BR>an e-mail group run by Ray Tomes. You can contact Ray at Ray Tomes
&lt;rtomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Yes, I have all of the back issues going back to
issue #1.

<P>Cyclically,

<P>Norman
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Dec 06 20:26:41 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 23170
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun,  6 Dec 1998 20:45:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id RAA01138;
	Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:40:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bart.accesschicago.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [204.120.72.3])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id RAA00939
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 708714231 (b-9.ppp.accesschicago.net [204.120.72.19])
	by bart.accesschicago.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA01712
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:37:40 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <008301be2181$f5fc4100$284878cc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 19:36:05 -0600
Reply-To: rturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "R.E.Turner" <rturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Robust
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 89e7f7b1dc88e89b727cd296f2984263

RT'ers
Here's a topic to sink your teeth into.  What is the current meaning behind
the buzz word "robust"?  Notice everything seems  to be "robust " these
days; that is exhibiting strength and vigor.  For example a countertrend
mechanical system, trading against the trend, which keeps shorting  a
position until it eventually turns a profit is likely to be a very" robust"
system,,,,,,,,, and take alot of guts to use.
Russ