[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

test



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Dec 03 15:19:55 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 22939
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu,  3 Dec 1998 18:05:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id OAA02914;
	Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.toronto.istar.net (mail1.toronto.istar.net [209.89.75.17])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id OAA02574
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms01-454.vcr.istar.ca ([137.186.177.200] helo=PGibson)
	by mail1.toronto.istar.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1)
	id 0zlha9-000503-00
	for realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 17:50:46 -0500
Message-Id: <006b01be1f0e$fa1d9b00$93b1ba89@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:42:55 -0800
Reply-To: Peter_Gibson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter Gibson" <Peter_Gibson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The Beans
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01BE1ECB.3693C1C0"
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3115.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 94be6af4f3f2dd40a77ff6d18179a811

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3511.1300"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Interesting post - I'm interested in your 
experience in trading Canola - which I think is traded only in Winnipeg.&nbsp; 
How are fills and liquidity compared to US markets?&nbsp; What are other 
differences in how canola trades vs. US grains?&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
</B>Anthony Denis Cattani &lt;<A 
href="mailto:dcattani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>dcattani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: 
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group &lt;<A 
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: 
</B>December 3, 1998 2:11 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Fw: The Beans<BR><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Sent this message last night but as I had 
    not updated my email address it did not go through....</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
    </B>Anthony Denis Cattani &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:dcattani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>dcattani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>To: 
    </B>Realtraders &lt;<A 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date: 
    </B>02 December, 1998 10:14 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>The 
    Beans<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi there All:</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Although I read a lot of the posts to this 
    list, I very seldom have a chance to contribute. I see there was a post this 
    a.m. about the bean market.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>As an oilseed trader, I would like to add my 
    two cents.....maybe three...</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>This rally in the oilseeds...from the 
    bottom....was in part engineered by the funds. Shortly after the beans 
    bottomed, a very large European fund established a very large soybean 
    position that seemed to start the market off into rally mode. Along the way 
    the North American fund traders have been in and out of the market a couple 
    of times. As I trade mainly Canola, and since it is a very commercial 
    market, I will refer to it's chart. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The first leg up was bought, and driven 
    heavily by the funds. The correction from this move was swift and rapid and 
    panicked most of the longs into selling near the lows with a 
    loss.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The second leg up saw a little less fund 
    involvement and most of the longs went into very strong hands. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The third leg up again saw heavy fund buying 
    with large additions to the longs. Most of these positions were bought 
    aggressively.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Then came the Thanksgiving Holiday. Richard 
    Denis' first love is beans. Coming off a very profitable yen position where 
    it is felt he made close to 100 mill., it is my opinion that he was back to 
    his old tricks by buying heavily in the bean market the day after 
    Thanksgiving. The set up was perfect. A lot of the trade was away, the 
    market was thin, the stops were waiting. Good old shoot from the hip trading 
    can still work, and here we are, moving on up.....</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Will it hold? My guess is maybe for the very 
    short term, maybe if the weather in South America cooperates. In the mid to 
    longer term, no. The fundamentals are not there. The weekly charts, at least 
    in Canola will break the accelerating support line next week. If the Canola 
    market, which is already overpriced, starts to break, it will take the bean 
    oil, and then the beans with it. Oh, since most of you do not watch the 
    canola market, it quite often leads the beans. Why, because it's a 
    commercial market, without the extra 'noise' that the bean trade 
    has.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>It is way to early for a weather market to develop in S. 
    America. If it stays dry the market will still be vulnerable to manipulation 
    to the upside by the funds. But, they are playing a dangerous game. The 
    first sign of a good general rain and look out below. As an added fact, 
    isn't it interesting that for the past week we have not been able to get 
    reliable weather reports out of Brazil? Just a coincidence you 
    say......</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>The long term monthly charts of Canola still point to one 
    more leg down. In probability it will be a nice sized drop of 50 to 80 
    dollars. I am expecting this to begin early next year. The only thing that 
    will negate the scenario is major weather problems in S. America. The bean 
    oil and the beans will follow. IF and WHEN that leg in complete, then we 
    will be in a very long buy and hold situation. Starting in late 1999 or 
    early 2000 inflation will start to slowly creep back in. This will be the 
    ride that most of us have waited for. It will rival the commodities run of 
    the seventies. I expect beans in the high upper teens, crude oil in the 50 
    to 80 dollar area, and God forbid, our mail boxes flooded with hundreds of 
    letters about why we should all buy gold. </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>That is the way that I see it.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Disclaimer: These are my own opinions, and are not put 
    forward to suggest or recommend positions in any of the markets 
    mentioned</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>As a post script.....I know that this has been brought up 
    many times in the past, but I am looking for a reliable end of day data 
    provider. I am adding software and I do not want to interfere with my on 
    line systems. I have checked out most of the providers and am still in a 
    fog. The best deal I came across was the options software that included a 
    full year of data with the software for $595.00 </FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Any and all suggestions will be appreciated. I used to 
    download TechTools, but since they changed their format I find the set up 
    not my liking.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Profitable trading all.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Anthony Denis Cattani.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Dec 03 15:36:46 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 3218
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu,  3 Dec 1998 18:10:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id PAA03674;
	Thu, 3 Dec 1998 15:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo24.mx.aol.com (imo24.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.68])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id PAA03522
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 15:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Intel55@xxxxxxx
	by imo24.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id QMASa19912;
	Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:00:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <d8fead96.366717fc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:00:12 EST
Reply-To: Intel55@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Intel55@xxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: E-Mini
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-To: comfut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 214
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 1351872936d41443f46a974e993520fd

In a message dated 12/3/98 8:50:10 AM Central Standard Time,
comfut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< 
 For all of you in favor of all electronic trading........The e-mini system
 is down.....the minds at the cme are trying to figure out what to do
 next.............
 
 Beautiful for those that need to exit a position............
 
 Maybe open outcry is here to stay.....don't sell those seats, yet........
 
 
 Tom
  >>
It was very amusing for the E-mini traders on the open today. I guess at the
ding of the bell, the E-mini pooped out. They made an announcement to the pit
and a bunch just laughed. I guess they are adding a bunch of memory to the
system right know to handle more "hits per second." There may be even some
individuals slowing down the system deliberately. Anyway it is the Euros which
run the CME (based on revenue), along of course with the brokers. If some
system were to take the Euros away from us, then good bye exchange. What they
need to do in the mini is make an internet web interface so you can trade
through the Merc on the computer. Or hey sell electronic
memberships....hmmmmmmmmm look at the volume of the mini. INCREDIBLE. Now just
for a moment think what would happen if we had MORE price points (maybe 00,
.20, .40, .60, .80, 00 ......or maybe just .10 like the big) and you were able
to trade larger. The contract would explode. THE mini will work out fine in
the future, but the brokers that run the exchanges obviously do not want it.
Once the mini is working faster and more efficiently, maybe like the new Eurex
or Liffe's Connect, the contract and electronic trading will become the
dominant trading platform.