|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT color=#000000 size=2>It's not been too long ago that this leading
indicator business was thoroughly discussed here. I do not believe that there is
a true leading indicator of any kind, but there are tendencies that do repeat
from time to time. Someone always says "price"; this is also a fallacy
that was discussed here before. Briefly price doesn't lead because it is a
reflection of fundamental and technical market input. In fact price is only
"real time" to the actual buyers and sellers on the floor.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Actually some sort of channel has fair
predicting ability because the market has a tendency to bounce from one side to
the other. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The real trick is how you handle the trade after
you get an "idea".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Brent</FONT>
<P></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Nov 18 12:17:13 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0) with SMTP id 17230
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:19:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id MAA11316;
Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crusoe.crusoe.net (crusoe.crusoe.net [206.136.64.10])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id MAA11175
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from default ([209.123.32.17]) by crusoe.crusoe.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52487U2500L250S0V35)
with SMTP id net; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:15:53 -0500
Message-Id: <36530079.3F6D@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 15:14:33 -0200
Reply-To: swp@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: swp <swp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proper Spelling
References: <36535F21.3484@xxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: atorchio@xxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 94273c3fb5151a8478d74bb8dddb3198
Alberto Torchio wrote:
>
> RTs,
>
> What is the proper plural of Index? Indices? Indexes?
> I've seen both and I'm too lazy to check a dictionary. :-)
>
> Alberto Torchio
> Torino, Italy
both are considered to be correct
|