|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi, John and thanks for your repply.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>To answer the questions:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I am a short term position trader in both
futures, options and equities.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I have a small capital (, $20,000) and I have
been trading for about one year.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Thanks</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Nov 08 10:43:29 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0) with SMTP id 11878
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 13:43:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id KAA01482;
Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.az.com (lucy.az.com [204.201.18.52])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id KAA01337
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:00:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from default (3-56-bham-wa.az.com [206.63.203.203] (may be forged))
by www.az.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA22307
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:00:37 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from howdy@xxxxxx)
Message-Id: <002b01be0b41$ab9fa9e0$cbcb3fce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:00:27 -0800
Reply-To: howdy@xxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Scott Jimmerson" <howdy@xxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: win98
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01BE0AFE.9C55EB40"
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: bdab8d8f1c213f145acc3362baa59271
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Last night I changed the pixels from 840x640 to 640x480 to see
the difference and now I can't change back because the "display
properties" is too large and it can't be re-sized or move enough to get at
the "ok" or "apply" keys at the bottom. No matter how I
push, I can't drag the window enough to the top of the screen. Does anyone
have an idea on how to change pixel without going to display properties
window. The only good thing now is that I don't need glasses to see the
words! Thanks in advance. Scott</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Nov 08 12:13:40 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0) with SMTP id 12885
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 14:46:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id LAA03200;
Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.ap.net (mailhost.ap.net [205.134.237.20])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id LAA15924
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ap.net (D-09.Portal-01.ap.net [207.44.186.10])
by mailhost.ap.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11135;
Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <3645EA07.9B678A0E@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 10:59:19 -0800
Reply-To: ist@xxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Ira <ist@xxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CYcles/JM Hurst Cycle course
References: <3.0.5.32.19981106140313.00837250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3.0.5.32.19981108005705.00833600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: David.D.Cicia@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 624c075ba3005c983e3f326141830bf4
You can call it what you will, swings, cycles, sine wave oscillations or by
any other name you wish to. There is rhythm to the markets. The rhythm is not
the same for every future, index or stock. You can read Hurst's and say it is
garbage or you can take the information it has to offer and apply the parts
that you find useful in the system you are using. I personally have used parts
of the information since 1974, I know a market maker who used to trade on the
CBOE who made $5,000,000 using it. Now it all may be bunk in your eyes, but
someone used it and did very well, I have used and found it very useful.
Whether you can use it is another matter. Different strokes for different
fokes. Ira
David Cicia wrote:
> The question of whether cycles are actually there or not is just idle
> speculation. What is more interesting is whether there is something useful
> in any of this.
>
> I look at what are called cycles as swings. The recent discussion with
> Clyde Lee and Bob R has been most pertinent to this. Maybe the cycle
> purists wouldn't agree, but looking for swing probabilities seems to me
> what it is all about.
>
> I was just wondering if Hurst's course had more useful info in this vein.
>
> David Cicia
>
> At 08:41 AM 11/8/98 +1100, Chris Jackson wrote:
> >You might want to look at this site. Our very own Marik Jurik.
> >
> >http://www.jurikres.com/faq/faq_cfb.htm#dominant
> >
> >"The big, obvious cycles you do see on price charts are actually the
> >result of a combination of many weak cyclic forces that sometimes line
> >up in phase to produce APPARENT dominant cycles that suggest the
> >presence of a dominant, slow cyclic force that, in fact, does not
> >exist".
> >
> >On the other hand I know people who use cycles. One of them uses Hurst's
> >stuff. I have the book - did not know of a course.
> >
> >Some say that fixed len cycles are not the way to go.
|