|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I cannot agree with you more I was with ZAP
futures for almost a month and Leo Web was down about 30% of the time, usually
on the biggest days. I am now with PMB and I have had no problems. However, they
do not include Market if touched orders in their pop up screen.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>William F. Nakielski <<A
href="mailto:frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx";>frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Saturday, October 24, 1998 4:32 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: who is the
best broker for fast daytrade S&P 500 futures
trades<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jay,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Well, it certainly isn't Waldock. When I was using
there system for the spoo it took about 3-4 minutes to get filled from the
time I'd hit the Enter button. Today I noticed a message on thier
screen saying that "when the CME can demonstrate the reliability again
of CUBS they'll again start using the system". So if you're
looking for speedy executions in your S&P trades, best look
elsewhere.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I'm in the process of opening an account with FTG (Futures
Technology Group) out of LA. They use a combination of very high -
tech systems to ensure traders of fast fills with confirmation of fills
reaching your computer in as little as 15 seconds under normal market
conditions and around a minute in fast market conditions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>There was a thread here that lasted over a week on this
same topic recently that got me to make the switch. Maybe if anyone
else switched over to FTG or PMBe they would let us know.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>In my opinion, don't waste your time with any brokerage
who depends on the CUBS/TOPS system for fills as most of the time you'll be
trading manually. The CUBS system is a piece of crap that crashes at
the mere scent of any volume in the air as I'm sure all the folks that trade
with LeoWeb can attest. (Includes LFG and Zap).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I personally don't know too much about the PMBe
(Professional Market Brokerage) system, but other traders had a lot of good
things to say about it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>The web site for FTG is <A
href="http://www.tradeftg.com";>www.tradeftg.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>and PMB is <A
href="http://www.pmbinc.com";>www.pmbinc.com</A> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Now I would like to go on record and thank all those who
contributed to those threads in the last few weeks. I never would have
discovered them if it weren't for you. I had completely given up
trading spoos as my system demands fast executions otherwise I loose money.
I've been stuck with the e-mini and getting eaten alive with
commissions. Hopefully I'll be very happy with FTG.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill N.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Milwaukee, WI USA</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B></B></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original
Message-----</B><BR><B>From: </B>jaygreen <<A
href="mailto:jaygreen@xxxxxxxxx";>jaygreen@xxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>RealTraders Discussion Group <<A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Friday, October 23, 1998 11:05 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>who is the best
broker for fast daytrade S&P 500 futures
trades<BR><BR> </DIV></FONT>who is the best broker for fast
daytrade S&P 500 futures trades? <BR>Lind Waldock, Jack Carl, LFG,
Zap?
<P>Do the electronic execution systems get you fills as fast as the
electronic stock execution systems do?
<P>Can anyone give an approximate time difference in fill time in just
calling in your <BR>brokerage firm and ordering versus the existing
electronic systems<BR><BR><BR>Jay Greenlees
<P> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Oct 25 10:27:24 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 9378
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:06:55 -0400 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id KAA20944;
Sun, 25 Oct 1998 10:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.ap.net (mailhost.ap.net [205.134.237.20])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id JAA20805
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ap.net (D-09.Portal-02.ap.net [207.44.186.42])
by mailhost.ap.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA04894;
Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:59:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <363366DB.DAD18F99@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:58:51 -0800
Reply-To: ist@xxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Ira <ist@xxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MKT: S&P (time and price)
References: <36335872.5E65D770@xxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: joe6964@xxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 7f4934554722a96d268ffc802a7dbcc3
On a cycle longer then the one shown, I have 1138.85 as a target with an 80%
probability. Granted, it could turn prior to that and I trade a much shorter
cycle, but until the 929 low on the Dec. contract is taken out that number is
valid. Ira
Joe Frabosilio wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Below is a chart using time and price of the S&P. I'm planning for the
> S&P to follow threw on Monday. With the a report on cnnfn, saying that
> brokers will be pushing customers into small caps and out of blue chip
> and tech, along with the Moodys downgrade of four Japanese Banks, and
> profit taking.
>
> Source IBD Monday 10/26/98 Page A8 " Greenspan's remedy: cut those
> rates"
>
> " In recent days, Fed policy-makers have been out in force, soothing
> investors raw nerves. Thomson Data's Ader says that's the best thing
> they can do. He says the Fed should offer" words of encouragement" and
> hope the market makes a steady recovery over time."
>
> Trade Well,
> Joe Frabosilio
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
|