[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

STK: CSCO closing update



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=x-user-defined" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hello everybody,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>In the FWIW dept, I closed my long CSCO calls 
position at a 13% loss in the trade.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>This completes the CSCO feedback loop. 
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>Gitanshu</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000 
size=2></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000 
size=2></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000 
size=2></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Aug 27 15:25:07 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 16221
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:11:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id PAA14269;
	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.onramp.net (mailhost.onramp.net [199.1.11.3])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id PAA14097
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rdawes-pc2 (ppp14-8.dllstx.onramp.net [206.50.201.8])
	by mailhost.onramp.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA07672;
	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 17:05:44 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <000401bdd206$d650acd0$08c932ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:05:44 -0400
Reply-To: <ron@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Ron Dawes" <ron@xxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Listen Only Squawkbox
In-Reply-To: <01bdd130$31e26d40$4484cfa9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-To: <frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx>,
        "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by accessone.com id PAA14099
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1

Where is the website.  If it was posted in a previous message, I missed it.

Thanks


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of William F.
> Nakielski
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 4:29 PM
> To: RealTraders Discussion Group
> Subject: Re: Listen Only Squawkbox
> 
> 
> Hi Phillip,
> 
> Guess I shot my mouth off too soon.  I've been to LOS website, but never
> heard their service.  I guess I was just working under the assumption they
> were the same.  I stand Corrected :-)
> 
> On the other hand Waldock's service is free and to me better than 
> nothing at
> all.  I guess I'm just to cheap to pay for something like that.  
> What's nice
> though, about it, is you can see if there is a discrepancy between the rt
> quotes on the computer and what the guy is calling out.
> 
> Prolific Profitable Trades to all,
> 
> Bill N.
> Milwaukee -- (Not as sexy or exciting as Hawaii (Gary K.), but hey, we've
> got more beer!  [|:-)]}
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nixon(MLS) <mbjp57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx <frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx>; RealTraders Discussion Group
> <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 06:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Listen Only Squawkbox
> 
> 
> >Hi Bill,  I would take issue with your comment that the only difference
> >between the Lind squawk and the LOS sqauwk is that Lind is Free.  I found
> >Lind to be a very poor service relative to LOS.  All the guys at 
> Lind seem
> >to do is call out the bid/offer.  They never give an idea of size traded,
> >how many people in the pit,  whether the buyers/sellers are Locals or
> >Goldmans or whoever all of which you will get with LOS.  I 
> should not knock
> >Lind really as they are providing a free service but it did not 
> add much to
> >my trading.  LOS on the other hand is I believe worth the $100 a month as
> >it does provide all of the above.   The sound quality I find to be better
> >also with LOS dedicated software.
> >
> >regards
> >
> >Philip
> >
> >----------
> >> From: William F. Nakielski <frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: Listen Only Squawkbox
> >> Date: 26 August 1998 09:44
> >>
> >> RT's
> >>
> >> Just a note to the LOS thread.  Lind Waldock has a similar service.
> >They
> >> have a guy on the floor who calls out the bid/ask and some sizes of the
> >> orders and by whom.  You can hear the traders in the background.  You
> >know
> >> when they are excited.  You know when they get bored ,athough 
> that hasn't
> >> happened too much lately :-).
> >>
> >> It's available over the internet and I've had the service for about a
> >year.
> >> As to downtime here, the only time is when the guy goes to lunch for a
> >half
> >> an hour.  He does take small breaks throughout the day for a minute or
> >two,
> >> sometimes to answer the phone or to rest his voice.  (It's hard to
> >imagine
> >> someone being able to keep going all day at his pace without 
> losing your
> >> voice.)
> >>
> >> As to the echo mentioned in the previous post, it is the same 
> here.  And
> >I
> >> have used it with both of my ISPs, so I guess you'll just have to live
> >with
> >> it.  That's just the way the Internet is.
> >>
> >> Other wise my comments are the same as the gentleman's post 
> about Listen
> >> Only Squawk.  I do like it.
> >>
> >> The only real difference between Waldocks service and LOS is the price.
> >> It's FREE (with an account).  So I guess it's hard to knock it.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Richard Josslin <oldfogey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 08:25 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Listen Only Squawkbox
> >>
> >>
> >> >Dear Bob,
> >> >
> >> >Bob Hunt wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Are there any users of the Listen Only Squawkbox out there?
> >> >
> >> >I've used it since May, and in July, I spent a day on the floor with
> >Jeff
> >> >Jacobsen, who owns and runs it.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If so, I would appreciate any feedback that you might be 
> able to give
> >> >> me on a couple of issues;
> >> >>
> >> >> Have you found it to actually help your trading? If so, in what
> >> >> manner?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, primarily in learning the quality of the trading: who is trading
> >> >what size.  Also, in learning when the data from my data provider (BMI
> >> >satellite) is lagging the market, which I've seen happen every now and
> >> >then, sometimes by over a minute (and there is no way to detect that
> >> >simply by watching the screen).
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> How do you receive it, via satellite or internet?
> >> >
> >> >Internet, at $100/month for 3-month intervals.  I understand 
> that after
> >> >the satellite quit several months ago, LOS has discontinued 
> their use of
> >> >satellite feed, so now it is only available by internet 
> ($100/month) or
> >> >telephone ($300/month).
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> How much downtime have you experienced with the system?
> >> >
> >> >Insignificant.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> What kind of technical difficulties have you experienced? (I've
> >> >> noticed during my trial that an echo problem seems to occur now and
> >> >> then. Does this kind of thing happen frequently?)
> >> >
> >> >I too have experienced that and am switching to another ISP 
> to see if I
> >> >can eliminate or lessen it.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Please feel free to make any other comments.
> >> >
> >> >I've been watching the S&P market tick by tick since '85 and Jeff
> >> >Jacobsen, in my opinion, is one of the saviest guys on the market that
> >> >I've met.  After trading with LOS, I wouldn't want to trade 
> without it -
> >> >it brings a whole new dimension to trading that is just not there with
> >> >only a screen.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> >> Bob Hunt
> >> >
> >> >Sincerely,
> >> >
> >> >Richard Josslin
> >> >
> >
> 
>