[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Bradley



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hello.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
Someone a few weeks ago posted a chart of the Bradley indicator on the S&amp;P 
or djia, I cant remember which.. Would they be able to post it again as I have 
lost that email.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>regards Peter</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Aug 13 07:23:07 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
	by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 16504
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:30:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id GAA18134;
	Thu, 13 Aug 1998 06:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [206.184.139.15])
	by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id GAA17930
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 06:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [199.4.64.161] (srf-161.nbn.com [199.4.64.161])
	by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.0/8.9.0/best.out) with SMTP id GAA09144
	for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Aug 1998 06:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <v01540b01b1f8a6e515bb@[206.184.127.125]>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 06:24:00 -0800
Reply-To: rjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: rjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard)
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Options
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1

If you believe the options are inexpensive you should be BUYING them not
selling them.

>R'Ters
>
>I see that the Oct. 900 and 950 Sugar Calls are trading at a discount to
>fair value.
>As a writer of options i would like to know :
>
>a.  Will the option price eventually trade at the Theoretical or fair value
>price as expiration nears.
>b.  Why would these options be trading at a discount.
>c.  I believe Sugar us going south, would it be wise to write Naked 900 or
>950 calls in the hope they expire worthless.??
>
>Any input would be appreciated.
>
>Regards
>
>Trevor De Vries