[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: crash index history



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


prior crashes and the crash index
http://24.1.161.8/PCIcharts.html




At 03:19 PM 7/31/98 EDT, CalaxCorp@xxxxxxx wrote:
>In a message dated 98-07-31 08:40:58 EDT, you write:
>
><< Subj:	Re: FUTR: Day/Swing trading
> From:	SP Broker1
>  
>  <<  Peter,
>  Why is the larger the account size the better (assuming the same number of
>contracts)?  Doesn't that mean one may end up losing more capital?
>   Bill W>>>
> 
> Hi Bill,
>  The larger account size eliminates (to some degree) the "fear" factor of
>trading with an undercapitalized account. It is very important for what goes
>on in your head.
>  Peter
> >>>>>>>
>
>Peter,
>
>Thank you for your explanation. 
>
>(1)  I think for the "fear" above, you are talking about the "account size"
>being the only trading capital available to the trader, therefore creating
the
>fear of "losing everything" and the resulting stress, affecting the trading
>decision of the trader.  Right?
>
>(2) What if there is other available risk funds, but it is just not in that
>particular trading account at that momemt?  Would that mean then there would
>be less "fear"?  That means the smaller account size is not a problem?
>
>(3) Is the following another consideration--  If the "account size" is
>adequate, so the broker would not have to monitor it so much, so that in case
>there is a series of bad trades, the intraday/overnight drawdown would not
>turn the account balance into a negative, forcing the broker to make a margin
>call or to liquidate the losing position, thus giving the trade a chance to
>recover back to profitability?
>
>(4) So a large account size is good for the brokerage/clearing firm--less
risk
>and less work.  But is it actually good or bad for the trader if his fear is
>not a factor?
>
>Thanks in advance for any clarification.
>
>Sincerely,
>BillW
>  
>
>