|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
size=2> Fellow
traders, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> In regards to the S&P500,
the following Elliott Wave analysis is presented</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> In light of the sharp decline
over the last few<BR>days, I m leaning to counting the rise from 6/16 as
corrective. Let me tell<BR>you
why.<BR> Counting the rise as
impulsive forces us to count wave 4 as a<BR>running complex correction, which
implies power, yet wave 5 of that count is<BR>only as long as wave 1. Wave
3 is just slightly longer than 1 & 5. Hence<BR>there is no real extention in
any of the 3 supposed impulsive waves, yet the<BR>presence of a running complex
correction should be confirmed by an<BR>extention in one of the
waves.<BR> The impusle wave to follow a running complex
usually needs to display<BR>power, however I'd settle for wave three to at least
be extended, yet that<BR>is again not the
case.<BR> Further, as running
corrections typicaly relate by external fibo's,<BR>you will notice that if the
rise from 6/16 to 29/6 can be counted as a<BR>zigzag, a .618 ext fibo
measurement gives the1199 high. So depending one<BR>ones, point of view,
the entire rise may be either a triple three, or even a<BR>double
three.<BR>
Your
thoughts<BR>
Regards Peter<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Jul 24 04:18:07 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 6241
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 06:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id DAA29185;
Fri, 24 Jul 1998 03:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from teapot21.domain3.bigpond.com (teapot21.bigpond.com [139.134.5.159])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id DAA28464
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 03:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by teapot21.domain3.bigpond.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id na530387 for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 20:38:11 +1100
Received: from CWIP-T-001-pool-201.tmns.net.au ([139.134.224.201]) by mail3.bigpond.com (Claudes-Prolific-MailRouter V1.3); 24 Jul 1998 20:38:11
Message-Id: <000f01bdb6ef$87418920$c9e0868b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 20:40:50 +1000
Reply-To: derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "peter" <derivatives@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: S&P500 , Cycles
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01BDB743.58242EA0"
X-To: "RealTraders Discussion Group" <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> <FONT
color=#000000>Im trying to take a consensus poll regarding trading cycles on the
S&P500.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
Please<FONT color=#000000> suggest the most reliable cycle period you have found
for the S&P500. </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><FONT color=#000000>
</FONT></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Jul 24 04:18:11 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 6947
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:09:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id EAA00351;
Fri, 24 Jul 1998 04:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id DAA00095
for <RealTraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 03:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from galactic ([12.74.72.26]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP
id <19980724105919.GQYP10564@xxxxxxxx>
for <RealTraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:59:19 +0000
Message-Id: <000101bdb6f2$219e3840$1a484a0c@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 04:59:25 -0600
Reply-To: "Richard Chehovin" <GalacticFXInternational@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Richard Chehovin" <GalacticFXInternational@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Chating Software
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "RealTraders" <RealTraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Good Morning RealTraders:
Can any one give me the telephone numbers for the following software
packages, so I can request Information on them.
Windows on Wall Street RT
MetaStock RT
Thank you in advance,
Richard J. Chehovin
|