|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mark:
I think you're being a little over zealous! There's nothing for sale here. I, for one, am fascinated.
- Stuart
>>> "bshumake" <bshumake@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 07/07 2:08 AM >>>
Mark,
You have a valid point. But I'm not asking people to look at past results
but at future results as all my signals will be posted the day before they
are to be used. Also this addresses a hot topic of "can money be made
trading a mechanical system." I think it can, but the real story will be
told as the trades unfold. I also think the educational aspect is addresses
by showing that money can be made period, by trading. ( This is assuming of
course that the walk-forward trades are profitable ) Also this absolutely
is not for sale. For starters, it is not fully tested, and secondly to sell
it I would have to be registered as a CTA ( as the law currently stands )
and/or a trading advisor, which I am not. So please...this really is just
to demonstrate ( hopefully ) that money really can be made trading a
mechanical system. Anyhow...thanks for your comments and let's see what
happens.
All the Best!
Bill Shumake
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark&TC <mseflin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bshumake <bshumake@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eddie Kwong <eddiekwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, July 07, 1998 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: Mechnical Trading System Walk-forward Test
>Please understand that this website is for realtraders only and is for
>educational purposes only. It is in no intended for use in an advisory
>capacity. This is so realtraders can monitor walk-forward testing only!
>Any comments will be welcome. Have fun and enjoy!
>
>Bill,
>
>I'm sure your intentions are good...but I have got to say that this smells
>like a fox in sheep clothes. You can't honestly tell me that a good number
>of someone's will not be emailing you with requests to purchase this
>trading system, even though you make your claims...please.....if it walks,
>talks, and looks like a duck well then....?
>
>What would be of greater benefit would be to design a conversation which
>would teach RT's how to do walk-forward testing, and how to analyze the
>results vs using historical data, and what to look for as to honest
>results, not just observing the results...is like putting up a big
>sign...."LOOK AT ME....LOOK HOW MUCH $$$ YOU WOULD HAVE MADE HAD YOU TAKEN
>MY SIGNALS".
>
>Mark Seflin
>
|