PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Found a firm that sells data for $10 a month...end of day for all.
Price seems low enough but to me the data appears to be a it un usual.
Someone else put up a chart of the data on http://www.bemore.com/investor.htm
The sellers of the data suggest that the data they have is from the exchange
if the exchange sells it ...it must be considered correct.
What do you guys think?
t 11:35 AM 6/22/98 -0500, Essan Soobratty wrote:
>Alright....alright....I'll concede that one! I was a little harsh on Jim
>Rogers. He got that one spot on. No I'm not long Russia but I used to
work with
>someone who now runs a Russian Stock Fund out of Greenwich CT..... The
guy has
>always had this buy-on-dips mentality.... oh well.
>
>As for JR: He did also say commodity prices were going to the moon and
T-bonds
>would not trade below 6% again.
>
>On a serious note. To a certain extent I do actually listen to analysts
and so
>called market "experts". The first thing I do when I read an article or
listen
>to an interview that has caught my attention is try to come up with counter
>opinions. What that does is gets the ball rolling on a brain-storming
process
>that (at least in my case) usually results in an issue or aspect of the
market
>being thought through more carefully than it would have been otherwise.
How many
>times have you been awake at 3am with so many thoughts in your head on a
certain
>market. I find this interlectually stimulating and I see it as a good
sign that
>things seen or heard are not being taken verbatum.
>
>On my hard disc I have a HTML page for almost every market, region etc that I
>think is relevant. ie I have pages for the US, Japan, Australia, Europe,
Grains,
>Metals, Energy, stocks, weather, demographic trends, etc, etc. If I read an
>article of interest I will put the general summary into the relevant file.
So
>then. If I am about to go long crude oil, out comes the file on energies
and I
>have an instant briefing on what has been said about that market going
back for
>however long. There will be comments from CNBC, from the WSJ, from
Barrons, from
>trade journals, from conversations with other traders etc.
>
>It is hard work keeping track, but I do trade full time and am not a
day-trader.
>If I looked at charts all day I would begin climbing the walls.....
>
>But I guess this is only valid because of the way I trade. Although I have a
>methodologies/systems that could be more or less mechanical I do inject an
>element of human-analysis. A fresh example is last week. When the Fed
>intervened mid-week one of my systems told me to go long the dollar index. I
>chose not to. I waited until Friday morning to begin buying $.
>
>There have been times when this human element has cost me dearly, but on the
>whole I am very much ahead due to this human element. It works for me.
>
>Rgds.
>
>Essan.
>
>
>HBernst963@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Jim Rogers has been very bearish on Russia and been right on that one. I
hope
>> you're not long!
>>
>> Howard
>
>
>
>
>
|